Standard 3 — Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response
Criteria in this standard
3.2 — AED Function Is Verified Through Regular, Documented Maintenance Checks
3.3 — Every Staff Member Present Can Actually Use the AED and Perform CPR
3.4 — A Cardiac Event Triggers an Immediate, Practiced Response, Not Improvisation
3.5 — Post-Event Review Genuinely Examines Response Time and Outcome
An AED Is Genuinely Within a Two-Minute Round Trip of Every Exercise Area
Non-Negotiable
In plain terms: An AED is within a two-minute round trip of every place people exercise — measured by walking it, not by looking at a floor plan.
| Facility category | Crisis | Transition | Small | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | Full | Full | Full | Full |
Why this matters
Survival from cardiac arrest falls by about 10% for every minute without defibrillation. An AED reached in four minutes gives a fair chance; in eight minutes, almost none. 'We have an AED' means nothing if it is at reception on the ground floor and the collapse is in the top-floor studio behind two doors. The two-minute round trip — from the exercise area to the AED and back — must be walked and timed from the furthest point of every exercise area. If it exceeds two minutes, a second AED is needed. Large or multi-floor facilities typically need several.
What good looks like
- An AED is genuinely within a verified two-minute round trip of every exercise area.
- Distance has been physically walked and timed, not just estimated.
- Large or multi-floor facilities have multiple AEDs genuinely covering every area.
Common failure modes
- AED placement exceeds a two-minute round trip from some exercise areas.
- Distance is estimated from a floor plan, never physically verified.
- A single AED serves a large facility, leaving some areas genuinely uncovered.
Worked example
If you are starting from zero — do this first
- Walk from the furthest corner of each exercise area to the AED and back. Time it.
- Any round trip over two minutes needs another AED.
- Install and mark them.
- Re-time annually.
Self-assessment questions
Evidence: AED placement verification
Evidence: N/A — tested directly
Evidence: Multi-AED coverage documentation
Common reasons for a PARTIAL answer
- Coverage is adequate for the main gym floor but not verified for a separate studio or outdoor training area. — Every genuine exercise area deserves the same real coverage, not only the primary space.
- The route was walked once at installation but hasn't been reverified after any layout change. — A layout change can genuinely alter real walking distance, and verification needs to reflect current conditions.
- Coverage is adequate during normal hours but not reassessed for areas open during reduced staffing.
Implementation plan
| When | What |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Physically walk and time the actual route from every exercise area to the nearest AED. |
| Week 2 | Address any area exceeding the two-minute round trip standard. |
| Week 3 | For larger facilities, position additional AEDs to achieve genuine, complete coverage. |
| Ongoing | Reverify distances after any facility layout change. |
How the Monitor verifies this
| Method | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| OBSERVE | Physical distance verification | Physically walks the route from each exercise area to the nearest AED and times the actual round trip. |
| DOCUMENT | Placement documentation review | Reviews AED placement records and facility layout for genuine two-minute coverage. |
| OBSERVE | Multi-area coverage check | Confirms coverage extends to every exercise area in a large or multi-floor facility, not just the primary space. |
Supervisor tips
- Physically walk the route from the furthest exercise area to the nearest AED and time it directly. — Direct, physical verification is the only real evidence of genuine coverage, not a floor-plan estimate.
- Ask about coverage for any less obvious exercise area, like an outdoor space or a separate studio. — This is where coverage gaps most commonly hide.
Evidence base
ASF training courses on GMJ Academy →
Foundation courses A-00 to A-03 are live. Criterion-specific modules are being developed and will link here when published.
AED Function Is Verified Through Regular, Documented Maintenance Checks
Non-Negotiable
In plain terms: The AED is checked on a schedule — battery, pads in date, readiness light — and the checks are written down.
| Facility category | Crisis | Transition | Small | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | Full | Full | Full | Full |
Why this matters
An AED with a dead battery or expired pads is a box on the wall. Batteries last two to five years; pads expire; the self-test indicator must be looked at. A weekly visual check (readiness indicator, pads present, expiry date) and a monthly documented check (battery status, pad expiry, accessories, cabinet alarm) by a named person, with expiries tracked and replacements ordered ahead, keeps the AED usable. The log is the evidence; a facility without one does not know.
What good looks like
- AED function is genuinely, regularly checked and documented.
- Battery status and pad expiration are specifically, actively verified.
- A real, defined response addresses any identified issue immediately.
Common failure modes
- AED function is assumed adequate simply because the device is present.
- Checks, if they happen, don't specifically verify battery or pad status.
- An identified issue doesn't trigger any specific, resulting response.
Worked example
If you are starting from zero — do this first
- Open each AED cabinet now. Is the readiness light green? Are the pads in date?
- Start a weekly visual check log.
- Track pad and battery expiry with 90-day reorder.
- Name a person responsible.
Self-assessment questions
Evidence: AED maintenance check record
Evidence: N/A — tested directly
Evidence: Maintenance issue response process
Common reasons for a PARTIAL answer
- Checks happen but not on a consistently maintained monthly schedule. — A consistent, regular schedule is what makes verification genuinely reliable, not occasional attention.
- Battery status is checked but pad expiration dates are less consistently verified. — Both components need genuine, specific verification for the device to actually function when needed.
- Checks are documented but the documentation isn't reviewed to confirm checks are actually happening as scheduled.
Implementation plan
| When | What |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Review current AED maintenance practice for genuine, regular, documented checks. |
| Week 2 | Establish a monthly check schedule specifically verifying battery and pad status. |
| Week 3 | Build a defined, immediate response process for any identified issue. |
| Ongoing | Confirm checks are genuinely occurring as scheduled through documentation review. |
How the Monitor verifies this
| Method | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| DOCUMENT | Maintenance check record review | Reviews documented, regular AED maintenance checks for genuine, specific verification. |
| OBSERVE | Current device check | Physically checks the AED's actual current battery and pad status. |
| DOCUMENT | Issue response review | Reviews the process for responding to an identified maintenance issue. |
Supervisor tips
- Ask to see the actual, current maintenance log and physically check the device's current status. — A real, current record compared against actual device status reveals genuine verification, not assumed function.
- Ask what happens specifically if a check reveals an expired pad. — A specific, confident answer reveals a genuine response process, not an assumption it would be handled.
Evidence base
ASF training courses on GMJ Academy →
Foundation courses A-00 to A-03 are live. Criterion-specific modules are being developed and will link here when published.
Every Staff Member Present Can Actually Use the AED and Perform CPR
Non-Negotiable
In plain terms: Everyone on duty — reception, cleaner, sales, not just instructors — can use the AED and do CPR, and has practised.
| Facility category | Crisis | Transition | Small | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | Full | Full | Adapted | Full |
Why this matters
The person nearest the collapse may be the receptionist. If only instructors are trained, the receptionist runs to find one while the member's brain goes without oxygen. Every staff member on the premises during opening hours — including part-time, evening, and weekend staff — must be trained and confident. AEDs are designed for lay use; the training is a few hours; the drills keep it fresh. The standard is 'every staff member present,' not 'someone in the building.'
What good looks like
- Every staff member present, not only instructors, is genuinely trained and capable.
- Training is genuinely current across all staff roles.
- Non-instructor staff report genuine confidence responding to a cardiac event.
Common failure modes
- CPR/AED capability is limited to certified instructors alone.
- Training has lapsed for staff outside direct instruction roles.
- Non-instructor staff express genuine uncertainty about responding.
Worked example
If you are starting from zero — do this first
- List every staff member and whether they have CPR/AED training. Include cleaners and reception.
- Train everyone.
- Train new staff before their first solo shift.
- Include all roles in drills.
Self-assessment questions
Evidence: Staff CPR/AED training record
Evidence: N/A — tested directly
Evidence: N/A — tested directly
Common reasons for a PARTIAL answer
- Front-desk and administrative staff receive initial training but refreshers lapse more than for instructors. — Every staff member's readiness deserves the same genuine, ongoing reinforcement, not just instructors'.
- Training is broad but confidence varies significantly among non-instructor staff. — Training completion alone doesn't guarantee the genuine, confident readiness a real emergency requires.
- Coverage is strong during peak hours but thinner during early morning or late evening shifts.
Implementation plan
| When | What |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Review current CPR/AED training coverage across all staff roles and shifts. |
| Week 2 | Extend training to all staff present during operating hours, not instructors alone. |
| Week 3 | Establish a consistent refresher schedule across all roles. |
| Ongoing | Confirm coverage specifically during lower-staffed shifts. |
How the Monitor verifies this
| Method | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| DOCUMENT | Broad training record review | Reviews CPR/AED training records for all staff present during operating hours, not only instructors. |
| DOCUMENT | Currency review | Reviews whether training is genuinely current across all staff roles. |
| ASK | Non-instructor confidence interview | Asks a non-instructor staff member how confident they'd be responding to a cardiac event. |
Supervisor tips
- Ask a front-desk or administrative staff member directly whether they're trained and confident in CPR/AED use. — This tests whether genuine capability extends beyond instructors, not an assumption it does.
- Check training currency specifically for staff working early morning or late evening shifts. — This is where coverage gaps most commonly appear.
Evidence base
ASF training courses on GMJ Academy →
Foundation courses A-00 to A-03 are live. Criterion-specific modules are being developed and will link here when published.
A Cardiac Event Triggers an Immediate, Practiced Response, Not Improvisation
Non-Negotiable
In plain terms: There is a written cardiac emergency plan with roles — who starts CPR, who fetches the AED, who calls the ambulance, who manages the crowd — and it is practised every quarter.
| Facility category | Crisis | Transition | Small | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | Full | Full | Adapted | Full |
Why this matters
In a cardiac arrest, the first four minutes decide the outcome, and in those minutes there is no time to decide who does what. A written protocol assigns roles by position (the nearest staff member starts CPR; the second fetches the AED; the receptionist calls emergency services and gives the address; the manager clears the area and meets the ambulance). Everyone knows their role. Quarterly drills — timed, with a debrief — turn the plan into reflex. A facility that has never drilled will improvise, and improvisation costs minutes.
What good looks like
- A specific, defined emergency response protocol genuinely exists.
- The protocol has been genuinely practiced through real drills.
- Staff roles are specifically defined and confidently known.
Common failure modes
- No specific protocol exists beyond a general expectation of appropriate response.
- The protocol exists only in writing, never practiced through a drill.
- Staff are uncertain about their specific role during a cardiac emergency.
Worked example
If you are starting from zero — do this first
- Write a one-page protocol with roles by position.
- Put role cards at reception and in every studio.
- Run a timed drill this month.
- Debrief and repeat quarterly.
Self-assessment questions
Evidence: Cardiac emergency response protocol
Evidence: Drill record
Evidence: N/A — tested directly
Common reasons for a PARTIAL answer
- A protocol exists and has been drilled, but not recently enough to remain genuinely fresh for current staff. — Genuine readiness depends on recent, real practice, not a drill from long ago.
- Roles are clear for full-time staff but not consistently reinforced for newer or part-time team members. — Every staff member present during a real emergency needs the same genuine role clarity.
- The protocol covers the main exercise floor but hasn't specifically been drilled for a less typical area, like an outdoor space.
Implementation plan
| When | What |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Review current emergency response protocol for specificity and genuine practice history. |
| Week 2 | Define specific staff roles for cardiac emergency response. |
| Week 3 | Conduct a genuine, practiced drill covering the full protocol. |
| Ongoing | Repeat drills periodically, ensuring newer staff are included. |
How the Monitor verifies this
| Method | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| DOCUMENT | Protocol documentation review | Reviews the actual, specific cardiac emergency response protocol. |
| DOCUMENT | Drill record review | Reviews records of genuine, practiced emergency drills, not protocol description alone. |
| ASK | Role clarity interview | Asks staff to describe their specific role during a cardiac emergency response. |
Supervisor tips
- Ask staff to describe their specific role during a cardiac emergency, not a general description of the protocol. — A specific, confident answer reveals genuine, practiced readiness.
- Ask when the last real drill occurred and who participated. — A specific, recent answer reveals genuine practice, not a protocol that exists only on paper.
Evidence base
ASF training courses on GMJ Academy →
Foundation courses A-00 to A-03 are live. Criterion-specific modules are being developed and will link here when published.
Post-Event Review Genuinely Examines Response Time and Outcome
Core
In plain terms: After any real cardiac event or drill, the facility reviews what actually happened — time to CPR, time to AED, time to ambulance — and fixes what was slow.
| Facility category | Crisis | Transition | Small | Standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | N/A | Full | Adapted | Full |
Why this matters
A drill or a real event that is not reviewed teaches nothing. The review asks: how long from collapse to CPR? To AED on? To shock? To ambulance called? To ambulance arrived? What delayed each? Then: what changes? A door that was locked, a staff member who froze, an AED that was further than thought, a phone that was engaged. Each finding becomes an action. Response times tracked over successive drills show whether the facility is getting faster.
What good looks like
- Real response time is genuinely measured and reviewed following events or drills.
- Genuine, resulting improvement follows identified gaps.
- Drills receive the same genuine review attention as real events.
Common failure modes
- No genuine review of actual response time occurs.
- Review, if it happens, doesn't lead to any resulting improvement.
- Drills are treated as a lesser exercise, without the same genuine review.
Worked example
If you are starting from zero — do this first
- Time your next drill: collapse to CPR, to AED, to shock, to call.
- Ask what delayed each step.
- Write one action per delay.
- Chart the times across drills.
Self-assessment questions
Evidence: Post-event review documentation
Evidence: Improvement action record
Evidence: N/A — tested directly
Common reasons for a PARTIAL answer
- Response time is generally discussed after an event but not specifically, numerically measured. — A specific, measured time reveals genuine performance more reliably than a general impression.
- Review happens for real events but drills don't consistently receive the same structured attention. — Drills are the primary, regular opportunity to catch and correct gaps before a real event occurs.
- Findings are identified but resulting changes aren't consistently tracked to confirm implementation.
Implementation plan
| When | What |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Review current practice for genuine response time measurement following events or drills. |
| Week 2 | Establish a structured review process specifically measuring actual response time. |
| Week 3 | Build genuine review attention for drills, equal to real events. |
| Ongoing | Track identified improvements through to confirmed implementation. |
How the Monitor verifies this
| Method | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| DOCUMENT | Post-event review documentation review | Reviews evidence of genuine response time measurement following real events or drills. |
| DOCUMENT | Improvement action review | Reviews whether genuine, resulting improvement follows identified review findings. |
| ASK | Drill review interview | Asks staff whether drills receive the same genuine review as real events. |
Supervisor tips
- Ask for the actual, measured response time from the most recent drill. — A specific, real number reveals genuine measurement, not a general impression of adequacy.
- Ask what changed as a result of the most recent drill review. — A real, specific example reveals whether review leads to genuine improvement.
Evidence base
ASF training courses on GMJ Academy →
Foundation courses A-00 to A-03 are live. Criterion-specific modules are being developed and will link here when published.