Accréditation Sans Frontières

International Accreditation of Healthcare Facilities

Fitness & Wellness Standards · Standard 3

Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response

ASF-FW-STD3-v3.0  ·  Published  ·  12 September 2026  ·  112 pages  ·  10 chapters

STANDARD 3

Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response

MANDATORY

5 criteria

  Standard 3.1 NON-NEGOTIABLE · Standard 3: Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response
An AED Is Genuinely Within a Two-Minute Round Trip of Every Exercise Area
ASSESSMENT
ASF-FW-STD3-v3.0
CR FULL TR FULL SM FULL ST FULL
3.1
NON-NEGOTIABLE
L1
THE STANDARD
An AED Is Genuinely Within a Two-Minute Round Trip of Every Exercise Area
An automated external defibrillator is genuinely positioned within a two-minute walking round trip of every area where exercise takes place, verified directly by physically walking the actual route, not estimated or assumed from the facility's general layout.
FACILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT Tick YES, PARTIAL, or NO for each question.
1 Is an AED genuinely positioned within a two-minute walking round trip of every area where exercise occurs?
A real, verified distance, not an estimate based on general facility layout.
Doc: AED placement verification
YES PARTIAL NO
2 Has this distance been physically walked and timed, not just measured on a floor plan?
Real, physical verification, not a theoretical calculation.
Doc: N/A — tested directly
YES PARTIAL NO
3 For a multi-floor or large facility, are multiple AEDs positioned to genuinely meet this standard everywhere, not just near the main entrance?
Genuine, complete coverage of every exercise area, not concentrated in one convenient location.
Doc: Multi-AED coverage documentation
YES PARTIAL NO

ALL YES Standard likely met. ANY PARTIAL Improvement plan required. ANY NO Blocks accreditation until resolved.

WHAT THE ASSESSOR DOES ON SITE no surprises, no hidden checks
OBSERVE
Physical distance verification
Physically walks the route from each exercise area to the nearest AED and times the actual round trip.
DOCUMENT
Placement documentation review
Reviews AED placement records and facility layout for genuine two-minute coverage.
OBSERVE
Multi-area coverage check
Confirms coverage extends to every exercise area in a large or multi-floor facility, not just the primary space.

REFERENCES

  1. [11] A study of sudden cardiac arrest across 252 sports facilities over 18 years found neurologically intact survival rates of 93 percent in centres with an on-site AED compared with 9 percent in centres without one, with on-site AED presence the only independent predictor of survival in multivariate analysis.
  Standard 3.1 · Standard 3: Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response
Guidance & Learning
GUIDANCE
ASF-FW-STD3-v3.0
WHY THIS STANDARD EXISTS

Survival after sudden cardiac arrest declines by 7 to 10 percent for every minute defibrillation is delayed, and a real, published study of sports centers found 93 percent neurologically intact survival where an AED was on-site, compared with 9 percent where it wasn't — this single factor is the strongest independent predictor of survival identified in that research, which makes actual placement distance a genuinely life-or-death detail, not a general safety formality.

The evidence: [11] A study of sudden cardiac arrest across 252 sports facilities over 18 years found neurologically intact survival rates of 93 percent in centres with an on-site AED compared with 9 percent in centres without one, with on-site AED presence the only independent predictor of survival in multivariate analysis.
WHAT GOOD LOOKS LIKE
✓ An AED is genuinely within a verified two-minute round trip of every exercise area.
✓ Distance has been physically walked and timed, not just estimated.
✓ Large or multi-floor facilities have multiple AEDs genuinely covering every area.
WHAT FAILURE LOOKS LIKE
✗ AED placement exceeds a two-minute round trip from some exercise areas.
✗ Distance is estimated from a floor plan, never physically verified.
✗ A single AED serves a large facility, leaving some areas genuinely uncovered.
MOST COMMON REASONS FACILITIES SCORE PARTIAL

1 Coverage is adequate for the main gym floor but not verified for a separate studio or outdoor training area.

Every genuine exercise area deserves the same real coverage, not only the primary space.

2 The route was walked once at installation but hasn't been reverified after any layout change.

A layout change can genuinely alter real walking distance, and verification needs to reflect current conditions.

3 Coverage is adequate during normal hours but not reassessed for areas open during reduced staffing.

Genuine coverage needs to hold regardless of which hours or areas are actually in use.

HOW TO IMPLEMENT IF YOU ARE STARTING FROM ZERO

Week 1 Physically walk and time the actual route from every exercise area to the nearest AED.

Week 2 Address any area exceeding the two-minute round trip standard.

Week 3 For larger facilities, position additional AEDs to achieve genuine, complete coverage.

Ongoing Reverify distances after any facility layout change.

FOR SURVEYORS — WHAT IS NOT OBVIOUS

Physically walk the route from the furthest exercise area to the nearest AED and time it directly.

Direct, physical verification is the only real evidence of genuine coverage, not a floor-plan estimate.

Ask about coverage for any less obvious exercise area, like an outdoor space or a separate studio.

This is where coverage gaps most commonly hide.

E-LEARNING academy.gmj.ge/fw-std3-1-aed-placement — 30 min · complete before self-assessment
  Standard 3.2 NON-NEGOTIABLE · Standard 3: Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response
AED Function Is Verified Through Regular, Documented Maintenance Checks
ASSESSMENT
ASF-FW-STD3-v3.0
CR FULL TR FULL SM FULL ST FULL
3.2
NON-NEGOTIABLE
L1
THE STANDARD
AED Function Is Verified Through Regular, Documented Maintenance Checks
The AED's function is genuinely verified through regular, documented checks — battery status, pad expiration, device readiness — not assumed functional because it's present, given most AED models lack built-in connectivity and require active, manual verification.
FACILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT Tick YES, PARTIAL, or NO for each question.
1 Is AED function genuinely verified through regular, documented checks, not assumed from presence alone?
Real, scheduled, documented verification, not an assumption the device works because it's there.
Doc: AED maintenance check record
YES PARTIAL NO
2 Are battery status and pad expiration specifically checked, not just general device presence?
Specific, genuine verification of these particular components, not a general glance at the device.
Doc: N/A — tested directly
YES PARTIAL NO
3 Is there a specific, immediate process for what happens if a check identifies a problem?
A real, defined response, not a problem identified without resulting action.
Doc: Maintenance issue response process
YES PARTIAL NO

ALL YES Standard likely met. ANY PARTIAL Improvement plan required. ANY NO Blocks accreditation until resolved.

WHAT THE ASSESSOR DOES ON SITE no surprises, no hidden checks
DOCUMENT
Maintenance check record review
Reviews documented, regular AED maintenance checks for genuine, specific verification.
OBSERVE
Current device check
Physically checks the AED's actual current battery and pad status.
DOCUMENT
Issue response review
Reviews the process for responding to an identified maintenance issue.

REFERENCES

  1. [12] Most AED models lack built-in connectivity to report their own status, establishing regular, manual verification of battery status, pad expiration, and device readiness as necessary practice, distinct from assumed functionality based on presence alone.
  Standard 3.2 · Standard 3: Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response
Guidance & Learning
GUIDANCE
ASF-FW-STD3-v3.0
WHY THIS STANDARD EXISTS

An AED that's present but not functional provides none of its real, documented survival benefit, and because most AED models don't automatically report their own status, a facility that doesn't actively, manually verify function on a regular schedule has no real way of knowing whether the device would actually work in a genuine emergency.

The evidence: [12] Most AED models lack built-in connectivity to report their own status, establishing regular, manual verification of battery status, pad expiration, and device readiness as necessary practice, distinct from assumed functionality based on presence alone.
WHAT GOOD LOOKS LIKE
✓ AED function is genuinely, regularly checked and documented.
✓ Battery status and pad expiration are specifically, actively verified.
✓ A real, defined response addresses any identified issue immediately.
WHAT FAILURE LOOKS LIKE
✗ AED function is assumed adequate simply because the device is present.
✗ Checks, if they happen, don't specifically verify battery or pad status.
✗ An identified issue doesn't trigger any specific, resulting response.
MOST COMMON REASONS FACILITIES SCORE PARTIAL

1 Checks happen but not on a consistently maintained monthly schedule.

A consistent, regular schedule is what makes verification genuinely reliable, not occasional attention.

2 Battery status is checked but pad expiration dates are less consistently verified.

Both components need genuine, specific verification for the device to actually function when needed.

3 Checks are documented but the documentation isn't reviewed to confirm checks are actually happening as scheduled.

A documentation process that isn't itself reviewed provides limited real assurance.

HOW TO IMPLEMENT IF YOU ARE STARTING FROM ZERO

Week 1 Review current AED maintenance practice for genuine, regular, documented checks.

Week 2 Establish a monthly check schedule specifically verifying battery and pad status.

Week 3 Build a defined, immediate response process for any identified issue.

Ongoing Confirm checks are genuinely occurring as scheduled through documentation review.

FOR SURVEYORS — WHAT IS NOT OBVIOUS

Ask to see the actual, current maintenance log and physically check the device's current status.

A real, current record compared against actual device status reveals genuine verification, not assumed function.

Ask what happens specifically if a check reveals an expired pad.

A specific, confident answer reveals a genuine response process, not an assumption it would be handled.

E-LEARNING academy.gmj.ge/fw-std3-2-aed-maintenance — 30 min · complete before self-assessment
  Standard 3.3 NON-NEGOTIABLE · Standard 3: Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response
Every Staff Member Present Can Actually Use the AED and Perform CPR
ASSESSMENT
ASF-FW-STD3-v3.0
CR FULL TR FULL SM ADAPTED ST FULL
3.3
NON-NEGOTIABLE
L1
THE STANDARD
Every Staff Member Present Can Actually Use the AED and Perform CPR
Every staff member present during operating hours — not only certified instructors — is genuinely trained and able to use the AED and perform CPR, not limited to whichever certified instructor happens to be nearby when a cardiac event occurs.
FACILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT Tick YES, PARTIAL, or NO for each question.
1 Can every staff member present during operating hours, not only certified instructors, actually use the AED and perform CPR?
Genuine, broad capability across all staff, not limited to certified instructors alone.
Doc: Staff CPR/AED training record
YES PARTIAL NO
2 Is this training genuinely current for every staff member, not lapsed for those in non-instructor roles?
Real, current training for everyone present, not only those whose primary role involves direct exercise instruction.
Doc: N/A — tested directly
YES PARTIAL NO
3 Would a staff member confidently know what to do if a cardiac event occurred and no certified instructor were immediately nearby?
Genuine, confident readiness, not uncertainty about acting without an instructor present.
Doc: N/A — tested directly
YES PARTIAL NO

ALL YES Standard likely met. ANY PARTIAL Improvement plan required. ANY NO Blocks accreditation until resolved.

WHAT THE ASSESSOR DOES ON SITE no surprises, no hidden checks
DOCUMENT
Broad training record review
Reviews CPR/AED training records for all staff present during operating hours, not only instructors.
DOCUMENT
Currency review
Reviews whether training is genuinely current across all staff roles.
ASK
Non-instructor confidence interview
Asks a non-instructor staff member how confident they'd be responding to a cardiac event.

REFERENCES

  1. [13] Early CPR and early defibrillation are established as the critical links in the chain of survival for cardiac arrest, with survival highest when both occur within the first minutes of collapse, establishing broad staff response capability, not reliance on a single certified individual, as necessary for genuine emergency readiness.
  Standard 3.3 · Standard 3: Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response
Guidance & Learning
GUIDANCE
ASF-FW-STD3-v3.0
WHY THIS STANDARD EXISTS

A cardiac event doesn't wait for the right staff member to be in the right place, and survival depends on immediate action within the first minutes — limiting genuine response capability to only certified instructors, rather than every staff member present, means a real emergency occurring near administrative or support staff loses precious time waiting for the right person to arrive.

The evidence: [13] Early CPR and early defibrillation are established as the critical links in the chain of survival for cardiac arrest, with survival highest when both occur within the first minutes of collapse, establishing broad staff response capability, not reliance on a single certified individual, as necessary for genuine emergency readiness.
WHAT GOOD LOOKS LIKE
✓ Every staff member present, not only instructors, is genuinely trained and capable.
✓ Training is genuinely current across all staff roles.
✓ Non-instructor staff report genuine confidence responding to a cardiac event.
WHAT FAILURE LOOKS LIKE
✗ CPR/AED capability is limited to certified instructors alone.
✗ Training has lapsed for staff outside direct instruction roles.
✗ Non-instructor staff express genuine uncertainty about responding.
MOST COMMON REASONS FACILITIES SCORE PARTIAL

1 Front-desk and administrative staff receive initial training but refreshers lapse more than for instructors.

Every staff member's readiness deserves the same genuine, ongoing reinforcement, not just instructors'.

2 Training is broad but confidence varies significantly among non-instructor staff.

Training completion alone doesn't guarantee the genuine, confident readiness a real emergency requires.

3 Coverage is strong during peak hours but thinner during early morning or late evening shifts.

A cardiac event can occur at any operating hour, and readiness shouldn't depend on time of day.

HOW TO IMPLEMENT IF YOU ARE STARTING FROM ZERO

Week 1 Review current CPR/AED training coverage across all staff roles and shifts.

Week 2 Extend training to all staff present during operating hours, not instructors alone.

Week 3 Establish a consistent refresher schedule across all roles.

Ongoing Confirm coverage specifically during lower-staffed shifts.

FOR SURVEYORS — WHAT IS NOT OBVIOUS

Ask a front-desk or administrative staff member directly whether they're trained and confident in CPR/AED use.

This tests whether genuine capability extends beyond instructors, not an assumption it does.

Check training currency specifically for staff working early morning or late evening shifts.

This is where coverage gaps most commonly appear.

E-LEARNING academy.gmj.ge/fw-std3-3-broad-staff-response-capability — 30 min · complete before self-assessment
  Standard 3.4 NON-NEGOTIABLE · Standard 3: Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response
A Cardiac Event Triggers an Immediate, Practiced Response, Not Improvisation
ASSESSMENT
ASF-FW-STD3-v3.0
CR FULL TR FULL SM ADAPTED ST FULL
3.4
NON-NEGOTIABLE
L1
THE STANDARD
A Cardiac Event Triggers an Immediate, Practiced Response, Not Improvisation
The facility maintains a specific, practiced emergency response protocol for a cardiac event — clear roles, a defined communication process, a rehearsed sequence of actions — not a general expectation that staff will respond appropriately in the moment without ever having practiced it.
FACILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT Tick YES, PARTIAL, or NO for each question.
1 Does the facility maintain a specific, defined emergency response protocol for a cardiac event?
A real, specific protocol with defined roles, not a general expectation of appropriate response.
Doc: Cardiac emergency response protocol
YES PARTIAL NO
2 Has this protocol genuinely been practiced through a real drill, not only described in a written document?
Real, rehearsed practice, not a protocol that exists only on paper.
Doc: Drill record
YES PARTIAL NO
3 Are staff roles specifically defined for this scenario — who calls emergency services, who retrieves the AED, who begins CPR?
Specific, practiced role clarity, not general awareness that everyone should help.
Doc: N/A — tested directly
YES PARTIAL NO

ALL YES Standard likely met. ANY PARTIAL Improvement plan required. ANY NO Blocks accreditation until resolved.

WHAT THE ASSESSOR DOES ON SITE no surprises, no hidden checks
DOCUMENT
Protocol documentation review
Reviews the actual, specific cardiac emergency response protocol.
DOCUMENT
Drill record review
Reviews records of genuine, practiced emergency drills, not protocol description alone.
ASK
Role clarity interview
Asks staff to describe their specific role during a cardiac emergency response.

REFERENCES

  1. [14] The chain of survival for cardiac arrest specifically requires early recognition, early CPR, early defibrillation, and early advanced care as coordinated, sequential actions, establishing a genuinely practiced, defined response protocol as necessary, distinct from improvised action in the moment.
  Standard 3.4 · Standard 3: Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response
Guidance & Learning
GUIDANCE
ASF-FW-STD3-v3.0
WHY THIS STANDARD EXISTS

Survival in the first minutes after a cardiac event depends on immediate, coordinated action, and a response improvised for the first time during an actual emergency is measurably less reliable than one that's been genuinely rehearsed — the difference between a practiced protocol and general good intentions is often the difference in how quickly a victim actually receives defibrillation.

The evidence: [14] The chain of survival for cardiac arrest specifically requires early recognition, early CPR, early defibrillation, and early advanced care as coordinated, sequential actions, establishing a genuinely practiced, defined response protocol as necessary, distinct from improvised action in the moment.
WHAT GOOD LOOKS LIKE
✓ A specific, defined emergency response protocol genuinely exists.
✓ The protocol has been genuinely practiced through real drills.
✓ Staff roles are specifically defined and confidently known.
WHAT FAILURE LOOKS LIKE
✗ No specific protocol exists beyond a general expectation of appropriate response.
✗ The protocol exists only in writing, never practiced through a drill.
✗ Staff are uncertain about their specific role during a cardiac emergency.
MOST COMMON REASONS FACILITIES SCORE PARTIAL

1 A protocol exists and has been drilled, but not recently enough to remain genuinely fresh for current staff.

Genuine readiness depends on recent, real practice, not a drill from long ago.

2 Roles are clear for full-time staff but not consistently reinforced for newer or part-time team members.

Every staff member present during a real emergency needs the same genuine role clarity.

3 The protocol covers the main exercise floor but hasn't specifically been drilled for a less typical area, like an outdoor space.

Every genuine exercise area deserves the same practiced readiness.

HOW TO IMPLEMENT IF YOU ARE STARTING FROM ZERO

Week 1 Review current emergency response protocol for specificity and genuine practice history.

Week 2 Define specific staff roles for cardiac emergency response.

Week 3 Conduct a genuine, practiced drill covering the full protocol.

Ongoing Repeat drills periodically, ensuring newer staff are included.

FOR SURVEYORS — WHAT IS NOT OBVIOUS

Ask staff to describe their specific role during a cardiac emergency, not a general description of the protocol.

A specific, confident answer reveals genuine, practiced readiness.

Ask when the last real drill occurred and who participated.

A specific, recent answer reveals genuine practice, not a protocol that exists only on paper.

E-LEARNING academy.gmj.ge/fw-std3-4-practiced-emergency-response — 30 min · complete before self-assessment
  Standard 3.5 CORE · Standard 3: Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response
Post-Event Review Genuinely Examines Response Time and Outcome
ASSESSMENT
ASF-FW-STD3-v3.0
CR N/A TR FULL SM ADAPTED ST FULL
3.5
CORE
L1
THE STANDARD
Post-Event Review Genuinely Examines Response Time and Outcome
Following any real cardiac event or drill, the facility genuinely reviews actual response time and outcome — how long until the AED arrived, how long until the first shock — with real, resulting improvement where warranted, not an event that passes without any structured reflection on what actually happened.
FACILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT Tick YES, PARTIAL, or NO for each question.
1 Does the facility genuinely review actual response time following a real event or drill?
Real, specific measurement of actual time, not a general sense that response was adequate.
Doc: Post-event review documentation
YES PARTIAL NO
2 Is genuine, resulting improvement made where review identifies a real gap?
Real, resulting action, not review without any consequence.
Doc: Improvement action record
YES PARTIAL NO
3 Are drills specifically reviewed the same way as real events, not treated as a lesser exercise?
Genuine, equal attention to drills, not only real emergencies.
Doc: N/A — tested directly
YES PARTIAL NO

ALL YES Standard likely met. ANY PARTIAL Improvement plan required. ANY NO Requires improvement plan.

WHAT THE ASSESSOR DOES ON SITE no surprises, no hidden checks
DOCUMENT
Post-event review documentation review
Reviews evidence of genuine response time measurement following real events or drills.
DOCUMENT
Improvement action review
Reviews whether genuine, resulting improvement follows identified review findings.
ASK
Drill review interview
Asks staff whether drills receive the same genuine review as real events.

REFERENCES

  1. [15] On-site AED use is associated with meaningfully faster time to first shock compared with externally delivered defibrillation, establishing genuine measurement of actual response time as necessary to confirming a facility's real readiness matches the evidence-based standard, not merely assumed adequate.
  Standard 3.5 · Standard 3: Emergency Preparedness & Cardiac Event Response
Guidance & Learning
GUIDANCE
ASF-FW-STD3-v3.0
WHY THIS STANDARD EXISTS

The real, documented survival benefit of on-site AEDs and rapid response depends entirely on response times that are actually as fast as they need to be, and a facility that doesn't genuinely review its own real response time after an event or drill has no way of knowing whether its actual practice matches what the evidence requires, or has quietly drifted slower than it should be.

The evidence: [15] On-site AED use is associated with meaningfully faster time to first shock compared with externally delivered defibrillation, establishing genuine measurement of actual response time as necessary to confirming a facility's real readiness matches the evidence-based standard, not merely assumed adequate.
WHAT GOOD LOOKS LIKE
✓ Real response time is genuinely measured and reviewed following events or drills.
✓ Genuine, resulting improvement follows identified gaps.
✓ Drills receive the same genuine review attention as real events.
WHAT FAILURE LOOKS LIKE
✗ No genuine review of actual response time occurs.
✗ Review, if it happens, doesn't lead to any resulting improvement.
✗ Drills are treated as a lesser exercise, without the same genuine review.
MOST COMMON REASONS FACILITIES SCORE PARTIAL

1 Response time is generally discussed after an event but not specifically, numerically measured.

A specific, measured time reveals genuine performance more reliably than a general impression.

2 Review happens for real events but drills don't consistently receive the same structured attention.

Drills are the primary, regular opportunity to catch and correct gaps before a real event occurs.

3 Findings are identified but resulting changes aren't consistently tracked to confirm implementation.

An identified gap that isn't tracked to genuine resolution may not actually be fixed.

HOW TO IMPLEMENT IF YOU ARE STARTING FROM ZERO

Week 1 Review current practice for genuine response time measurement following events or drills.

Week 2 Establish a structured review process specifically measuring actual response time.

Week 3 Build genuine review attention for drills, equal to real events.

Ongoing Track identified improvements through to confirmed implementation.

FOR SURVEYORS — WHAT IS NOT OBVIOUS

Ask for the actual, measured response time from the most recent drill.

A specific, real number reveals genuine measurement, not a general impression of adequacy.

Ask what changed as a result of the most recent drill review.

A real, specific example reveals whether review leads to genuine improvement.

E-LEARNING academy.gmj.ge/fw-std3-5-post-event-review — 30 min · complete before self-assessment

Test your facility against this standard

Open self-assessment — no login, no fee.

Start the self-assessment

QR code
QR Code
Scan to open.
Print to share.
DocumentDownload QR
© 2026 Accréditation Sans Frontières · PHIG · Sheni Network