EDITIONEN·FR·ქართ

Accréditation Sans Frontières

International Accreditation of Healthcare Facilities

Governance & Methodology · IAP Track 2 of 3

ASF Standards for Surveyor Training Programmes

ASF’s answer to ISQua EEA’s Accreditation of Surveyor Training Programmes track — verified criterion-by-criterion against the official 4th Edition.

ASF-STP-STD-v1  ·  Updated 6 October 2026  ·  Crosswalked against Guidelines and Standards for Surveyor Training Programmes, 4th Edition v1.0, March 2022 (ieea.ch)
5
Standards
32
Criteria
32/32
Addressed
70%
ISQua Pass Threshold
Verified, not merely mapped. ASF obtained the complete official text of ISQua EEA’s Guidelines and Standards for Surveyor Training Programmes, 4th Edition v1.0 (March 2022), including every criterion, its guidance, and suggested evidence. This is a genuine criterion-by-criterion crosswalk, not a structural approximation. Verification against this document revealed 24 of 32 criteria were not addressed by ASF’s existing standard — these have been built into a new Domain G (Training Programme Governance) in ASF-MON-STD-v1.1, closing every gap.

Full criterion crosswalk

Crit. ISQua requirement (summarised) ASF-MON-STD-v1.1
Standard 1 — Programme Development and Planning
1.1 Training objectives defined and documented Standard G1
1.2 Delivery plan: type, activities, resources, timeframes Standard G1, E1/E2
1.3 Risk analysis specific to the training programme Standard G1
1.4 Legal/ethical requirements: IP, copyright, COI, confidentiality Standard A3/C3, ASF-POL-31
1.5 Surveyor competencies defined, documented, available, basis for design Standard G2
1.6 CPD point eligibility determined Standard G2
Standard 2 — Programme Management
2.1 Roles, responsibilities, authorities defined Standard E3, G3
2.2 Skilled staff manage design, assessment, administration Standard G3
2.3 Trainers selected for balanced skills/experience (new, 4th ed.) Standard G3
2.4 Trainers evaluated and supported (new, 4th ed.) Standard G3
2.5 Policies reviewed at intervals with stakeholders ASF-POL-46, Standard F3
2.6 Equal opportunity, special-needs accommodation Standard G4
2.7 Learning/physical/technological resources evaluated Standard G5
2.8 Programme effectiveness evaluated, results drive change (new, 4th ed.) Standard G5
Standard 3 — Trainee Management
3.1 Information provided to trainees pre-training Standard G6
3.2 Trainee records created with informed consent Standard G7
3.3 Records confidential, accessible, retained per policy Standard G7, ASF-POL-18/40
3.4 Complaints process communicated to trainees Standard G8, ASF-POL-21
Standard 4 — Training Programme Delivery
4.1 Initial training: planning, conducting, report writing, post-survey Standard G9, E1/E2
4.2 Standards interpretation and legal requirements Standard G9
4.3 Interpersonal skills and professional practice Standard G9, ASF-POL-31
4.4 Diversity and equity training (new, 4th ed.) Standard G9, ASF-POL-20
4.5 Practical onsite element (new, 4th ed.) Standard G9, E2 (now both tracks)
4.6 Update training based on identified needs + legislation Standard G10
4.7 Learning objectives and expected outcomes per session Standard G11
4.8 Adult-learning methodology: case studies, role play, etc. Standard G11
4.9 Session feedback collected, analysed, used for improvement Standard G5
Standard 5 — Assessment of Competence
5.1 Assessment plan: tasks, scoring, resources Standard G12
5.2 Documented assessment procedure Standard G12, E1/E2
5.3 Results provided in writing Standard G12
5.4 Arrangements for incomplete/unsuccessful trainees Standard G12
5.5 Results collated/reviewed after each programme (new, 4th ed.) Standard G12, G5

What this means

All 32 criteria are now addressed by a specific, named ASF standard — not a general claim of coverage. ISQua’s own pass threshold is 70% overall and 70% per Standard, with no more than two low/moderate-risk criteria below full achievement per Standard; having every criterion addressed in writing is the necessary starting point for that bar, not the same as having evidence built up in practice over a survey cycle.

ISQua EEA accredits surveyor training programmes for four years following a two-surveyor desktop review, after submitting a self-assessment via ISQua EEA Collaborate at least 8 weeks ahead of survey (technical review) and a final submission 4 weeks ahead. ASF’s Standard G1–G12 content is written to produce exactly the evidence that process would require.

Source: ISQua EEA, Guidelines and Standards for Surveyor Training Programmes, 4th Edition v1.0, March 2022, ieea.ch. Full standard: ASF-MON-STD-v1.1.

© 2026 Accréditation Sans Frontières · PHIG · Sheni Network