EDITIONEN·FR·ქართ

Accréditation Sans Frontières

International Accreditation of Healthcare Facilities

Reference Document · All Training Stages

ASF Surveyor Competency Framework

The ASF Surveyor Competency Framework defines the twelve core competencies every certified ASF Surveyor is expected to demonstrate. It underpins all surveyor training, assessment, and re-certification activities, and provides the foundation for ASF’s ISQua EEA accreditation submission.

About the Framework

The Framework was developed by the ASF Standards and Training Committee in 2024, drawing on competency models from Accreditation Canada, the Joint Commission International, the Health Quality Council of Alberta, and ISQua’s own published guidance on surveyor professional standards. It was validated through consultation with active ASF Surveyors, national health authority representatives, and patient advocacy partners.

The twelve competencies are organised into three domains, each reflecting a distinct dimension of surveyor professionalism:

How the Framework is used

Every formal assessment in the ASF Surveyor pathway references specific competency codes. SRV-02 classroom simulations assess P1–P5 and B1–B4. The SRV-03 Mentor Assessment Form rates all twelve competencies. The Surveyor Certification Examination tests K1–K4 comprehensively and applies scenario-based assessment to P1–P5 and B1–B4. Three-year re-certification examinations cover all twelve competency domains.

Domain 1 — Knowledge (K1–K4)

The Knowledge domain covers the core body of understanding that ASF Surveyors must possess before entering any survey. It is primarily developed in SRV-01 and reinforced throughout SRV-02.

K1 Standards Architecture & Hierarchy Demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of ASF standards structure, including the relationship between chapters, standards, elements of performance, and scoring criteria. Can navigate the full standards set independently and locate relevant criteria for any clinical or administrative service area. Understands the rationale behind standards groupings and can explain standards requirements to facility staff in plain, accessible language.
K2 Accreditation Process & Methodology Understands the full accreditation cycle from application through survey to decision and post-survey follow-up. Can explain the purpose and structure of each survey phase (opening conference, document review, facility walk, patient tracers, closing conference). Understands how survey findings translate into accreditation decisions and how conditional or partial accreditation works. Familiar with the distinction between commendations, requirements, and recommendations in findings reporting.
K3 Survey Planning & Logistics Can develop a comprehensive, standards-compliant survey agenda for a given facility type. Understands how to allocate survey team roles based on team composition and clinical area coverage requirements. Can identify priority focus areas from pre-survey documentation and design interview and tracer schedules accordingly. Knows how to manage deviations from the planned agenda during a live survey.
K4 Scoring, Calibration & Accreditation Decision Logic Applies ASF’s scoring rubric accurately and consistently across diverse clinical and administrative standards. Understands the thresholds and weighting logic that inform accreditation decisions. Can identify and constructively resolve scoring disagreements within a survey team. Demonstrates understanding of how individual standards scores aggregate to domain-level and programme-level outcomes, and how outstanding requirements affect accreditation recommendations.

Domain 2 — Proficiency in Practice (P1–P5)

The Proficiency domain covers the applied, observable skills exercised during live survey activities. These are assessed primarily through SRV-02 simulations and SRV-03 field placement.

P1 Survey Preparation Consistently completes thorough pre-survey preparation: reviews all submitted facility documentation (self-assessment, policies, quality reports, corrective action plans); identifies gaps, inconsistencies, and priority areas requiring investigation during the survey; prepares targeted interview guides and standards checklists tailored to the specific facility; contributes substantively to pre-survey team planning meetings.
P2 Interview Technique Conducts structured, standards-based interviews with clinical staff, management, and patients that elicit relevant, reliable information. Uses open-ended questioning techniques effectively; listens actively and probes appropriately; maintains a professional and non-threatening interview environment. Adapts interview style to the role and communication needs of the interviewee. Triangulates interview information against document and observational evidence. Documents interview findings clearly and links them to specific standards criteria.
P3 Document Review & Evidence Gathering Applies systematic and efficient document review methodology to clinical records, policies, procedures, audit reports, meeting minutes, and other evidence sources. Identifies compliance, partial compliance, and non-compliance against specific standards criteria. Recognises patterns of systemic concern versus isolated findings. Manages the volume and variety of evidence effectively within the time constraints of a live survey.
P4 Standards Scoring Applies ASF’s four-point scoring scale accurately, consistently, and with appropriate evidential justification. Scores are well-calibrated with other team members and within the range established through training exercises. Can clearly explain scoring rationale to both colleagues and, in debrief contexts, to facility leadership. Demonstrates awareness of common scoring errors (severity inflation, halo effect, recency bias) and actively corrects for them.
P5 Findings Writing & Report Authorship Produces findings narratives that are clear, evidence-based, proportionate, and free of ambiguity. Each finding is linked to specific standards criteria and supported by concrete, documented evidence. Corrective action requirements are stated in actionable, measurable terms. Commendations are specific and genuine — not formulaic. Reports are written in accessible language that facility leadership can act on without additional interpretation. Findings are submitted on schedule and require minimal revision from the survey team lead.

Domain 3 — Behaviour & Professionalism (B1–B4)

The Behaviour domain covers the professional values, interpersonal conduct, and ethical standards that define the credibility and trustworthiness of an ASF Surveyor. These are assessed across all training stages, with particular weight in the SRV-03 Mentor Assessment.

B1 Professionalism & Ethics Consistently demonstrates the highest standards of professional conduct during survey activities. Maintains confidentiality of all survey-related information. Declares actual and potential conflicts of interest promptly and transparently. Behaves with impartiality and objectivity — findings and scores reflect evidence, not personal relationships, clinical specialty preferences, or prior knowledge of the facility. Upholds the ASF Code of Conduct at all times. Does not make informal accreditation-related statements to facility staff outside formal survey communications.
B2 Communication & Facilitation Communicates clearly, respectfully, and constructively in all survey interactions — with facility staff, patients, management, and fellow surveyors. Delivers opening and closing conferences with an appropriate tone: authoritative without being intimidating; constructive rather than adversarial. Gives and receives feedback within the survey team professionally. Adapts communication style effectively to different audiences and contexts, including emotionally charged interactions with facility leadership during findings delivery.
B3 Team Collaboration Functions effectively as a member of a diverse, multi-disciplinary survey team. Shares information, evidence, and observations with colleagues proactively and without prompting. Contributes constructively to team scoring and calibration discussions. Supports less experienced team members or interns appropriately. Manages interpersonal tensions within the team constructively. Completes assigned tasks on schedule, minimising impact on team delivery timelines.
B4 Independence & Professional Judgement Demonstrates the capacity to form and defend well-reasoned professional judgements based on evidence, even when this requires disagreeing respectfully with more senior colleagues or challenging facility management’s characterisation of their own performance. Does not defer to social or hierarchical pressure when it conflicts with an evidence-based assessment. Seeks guidance appropriately when faced with genuinely uncertain or complex situations, rather than either avoiding difficult decisions or making overconfident judgements without adequate evidence.

Competency Assessment Across the Training Pathway

Competency SRV-01 Online SRV-02 Classroom SRV-03 Internship Certification Exam 3-Year Re-certification
K1 Standards Architecture Developed Reinforced + assessed Applied Examined Examined
K2 Accreditation Process Developed Reinforced + assessed Applied Examined Examined
K3 Survey Planning Introduced Developed + assessed Applied + assessed Examined Examined
K4 Scoring & Calibration Introduced Developed + assessed Applied + assessed Examined Examined
P1 Preparation — Introduced + assessed Formally assessed Scenario-based Scenario-based
P2 Interview Technique — Developed + assessed Formally assessed Scenario-based Scenario-based
P3 Document Review — Developed + assessed Formally assessed Scenario-based Scenario-based
P4 Standards Scoring — Developed + assessed Formally assessed Scenario-based Scenario-based
P5 Findings Writing — Developed + assessed Formally assessed Written exercise Written exercise
B1 Professionalism Introduced Observed + assessed Formally assessed Scenario-based Scenario-based
B2 Communication — Observed + assessed Formally assessed Scenario-based Scenario-based
B3 Team Collaboration — Observed + assessed Formally assessed Scenario-based Scenario-based
B4 Professional Judgement — Observed + assessed Formally assessed Scenario-based Scenario-based

← Back to the Become an ASF Surveyor overview