EDITIONEN·FR·ქართ

Accréditation Sans Frontières

International Accreditation of Healthcare Facilities

Document codeASF-GOV-004
VersionV3.0  ✓ Published
Effective date2026-09-30
Approved byProf. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD — President, Accréditation Sans Frontières
Applies toAll ASF personnel, surveyors, committee members, and any other persons with access to confidential information generated in ASF accreditation processes
Legal frameworkGDPR (EU) 2016/679 · Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 (France) · Law of Georgia No. 5669 on Personal Data Protection
Related documentsASF-GOV-003 · ASF-GOV-005 · ASF-OPS-001 · ASF-OPS-002 · ASF-QMS-003
SupersedesASF-GOV-004 V2.0 (2026-09-30)
Next reviewSeptember 2031, or earlier on trigger

Version History

Version Date Nature of change Approved by
V0.1 2024-11-18 Initial draft —
V1.0 2025-01-20 First published version Prof. G. Pkhakadze, ASF President
V2.0 2025-10-20 GDPR and French law (Loi 78-17) sections added; 6-category classification table added Legal Adviser
V3.0 2026-09-30 Georgian law (No. 5669) added; 8-row retention table; 72-hour CNIL breach notification; approved for ISQua EEA package Prof. G. Pkhakadze, ASF President

1. Purpose

1.1Confidence in confidentiality is essential to the integrity of the accreditation process. Applicants and accredited organisations must be able to share sensitive operational, clinical, and financial information with ASF surveyors and decision-makers, knowing this information will be used solely for accreditation purposes and will not be disclosed without consent.

1.2This policy establishes ASF’s requirements for protecting confidential information across all accreditation activities: survey conduct, decision-making, standards development, appeals, and post-accreditation monitoring. Confidentiality obligations are indefinite — they do not expire at the end of an engagement.

2. Scope of Application

This policy applies to all ASF surveyors, committee members, the ASF President, external experts and consultants, and any administrative or support staff with access to accreditation records. The obligation is effective from the moment confidential information is received and continues indefinitely.

3. Classification of Confidential Information

3.1The following categories are classified as confidential by default:

Category Specific information types
Applicant and accredited organisation information All information in applications, self-assessments, or provided during surveys: organisational structure, financial data, staffing, clinical performance data, incident records, patient data, policy and procedure documents.
Survey findings and process Draft and final survey reports; surveyor field notes and working documents; nonconformance records; corrective action plan submissions; survey schedules; communications between survey team and assessed organisation.
Accreditation decision information ADC deliberations, discussions, and voting records; draft decisions before formal issue; all pre-decision communications with the applicant.
Standards development working materials Unpublished draft standards; SDC meeting minutes before publication; consultation responses from named stakeholders (unless consent given); expert review reports; SDC working documents.
Personnel and governance records Conflict-of-interest declarations; surveyor competency records and examination results; personnel files; committee deliberations; performance or conduct communications.
Third-party information Any information provided to ASF by a regulatory body, peer accreditation organisation, or other source under an expectation of confidence.

3.2Where there is doubt as to whether information is confidential, it is treated as confidential until ASF confirms otherwise.

4. What Is Publicly Disclosed

4.1ASF publishes the following for each accredited organisation (with consent or as a condition of accreditation): name and address of the accredited facility; the ASF standard assessed against; accreditation status; effective dates; and certificate number.

4.2The following governance documents are publicly disclosed on france-asf.fr: all published accreditation standards; this policy and all other published governance documents (GOV, OPS, QMS series); ASF-EV-001 through ASF-EV-004; and the ASF ISQua accreditation certificate on receipt. No other information is disclosed without express written consent.

ISQua Principle 3 (Transparency) requires that governance documents and standards are publicly available, while Principle 6 (Confidentiality) requires that assessment information is protected. Both requirements are met by ASF’s information classification framework.

5. Confidentiality Obligations of Personnel

All persons subject to this policy must: (a) use confidential information only for the accreditation purpose for which it was received; (b) not disclose it to any third party without ASF’s express written authorisation; (c) take reasonable precautions against unauthorised access; (d) return or securely destroy confidential documents on completion of their engagement; and (e) immediately report any suspected or actual breach. These obligations do not expire.

6. Permitted Disclosures

Permitted disclosures include: (a) disclosure within the ASF team as necessary for accreditation activities; (b) disclosure to ISQua EEA assessors of anonymised/de-identified records (no facility identification without consent); (c) disclosure required by court order or applicable law (minimum necessary, advance notice to affected party where legally permitted); (d) disclosure with express written consent; and (e) aggregate anonymised data for research or public reporting where no individual is identifiable. All permitted third-party disclosures are documented and the recipient is required to agree to equivalent confidentiality obligations.

7. Data Protection and Personal Data

7.1ASF processes personal data in accordance with: GDPR (EU) 2016/679 (as a controller established in France); Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 (French Data Protection Act); and Law of Georgia No. 5669 on Personal Data Protection (for Georgian data subjects).

7.2Legal bases include: performance of a contract (accreditation agreement, engagement agreement); legitimate interests (operating the accreditation programme); and compliance with a legal obligation.

7.3ASF does not process special category personal data beyond what is strictly necessary. Surveyors reviewing patient records during surveys note only what is necessary to assess the criterion in question and do not record identifying patient information in reports.

7.4Data subjects have GDPR rights including access, rectification, erasure (subject to legal retention requirements), and objection. Requests are addressed to ASF at the contact details on france-asf.fr.

8. Records Retention and Destruction

Record type Minimum retention Basis
Survey reports (final) 10 years from survey date Accreditation programme record
Survey working notes and field records 5 years from survey date Quality assurance and complaint response
Accreditation decision records 10 years from decision date Accreditation programme record
Conflict-of-interest declarations 5 years from activity date Governance record
Confidentiality undertakings 5 years after end of engagement Governance record
Standards development working documents 10 years from publication of relevant standard Evidence for ISQua EEA and future revisions
Complaint and appeal records 10 years from closure Governance and legal
Personal data of facility personnel 5 years from survey date, subject to GDPR erasure rights GDPR and programme record

At the end of retention periods, records are securely destroyed (physical: shredded; electronic: deleted and overwritten). Destruction is documented in the ASF records destruction log. Surveyors and committee members do not retain confidential documents beyond their immediate engagement.

9. Confidentiality Breach Response

9.1–9.2A confidentiality breach is any actual or suspected unauthorised disclosure, access, loss, destruction, or alteration of confidential information. Any person who becomes aware must report to the ASF President within 24 hours. Where the breach involves the President personally, report to the SDC Chair.

9.3Response steps: (a) Containment — stop ongoing disclosure, secure affected information; (b) Assessment — determine nature, scope, categories affected, and likely consequences; (c) Notification — notify affected organisations without undue delay; where the breach involves personal data meeting the GDPR Article 33 threshold, notify the CNIL within 72 hours; (d) Remediation — implement measures to prevent recurrence; (e) Documentation — record the breach, assessment, notifications, and remediation in the ASF breach register.

9.5Intentional unauthorised disclosure: permanent removal from all ASF activities. Negligent handling resulting in a breach: formal warning and possible suspension. Decisions may be appealed under ASF-GOV-005.

10. ISQua EEA Alignment

This policy meets the requirements of ISQua EEA Principle 6 (Confidentiality) and the data protection requirements of ASF’s operating jurisdictions. The ASF ISQua EEA Crosswalk (ASF-EV-004) maps these provisions to the applicable EEA criteria.

11. References

[1] ISQua IAP. Principles for Standards. 6th Ed. ISQua EEA, Dublin, 2023.
[2] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR). Official Journal of the EU, L 119, 4 May 2016.
[3] Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l’informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés (as amended). Légifrance, France.
[4] Law of Georgia No. 5669 of 28 December 2011 on Personal Data Protection (as amended).
[5] EDPB. Guidelines 01/2021 on Examples Regarding Data Breach Notification. Version 1.0, 14 January 2021.
[6] CNIL. Guide RGPD pour les responsables de traitement. CNIL, Paris, 2022.
[7] ISO/IEC 27001:2022 — Information Security, Cybersecurity and Privacy Protection. ISO, Geneva, 2022.
[8] ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 — Conformity Assessment. §5.3 Confidentiality. ISO, Geneva, 2015.
[9] JCI Accreditation Standards for Hospitals. 7th Ed. JCI, Oak Brook, 2020.
[10] HQACI. Confidentiality Policy. ISQua EEA Accredited Document, 2026.
[11] Shaw CD et al. Profiling health-care accreditation organisations. Int J Qual Health Care. 2013;25(3):222–231.
[12] Council of Europe. Convention 108+ — Convention for the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data. Strasbourg, 2018.

Document code: ASF-GOV-004  ·  Version: V3.0  ·  Effective: 2026-09-30  ·  Next review: September 2031  · 
All governance documents

Download the approved document

ASF-GOV-004 — Confidentiality Policy · Version V3.0

Download PDF Full ASF Standards Package 2026

© 2026 Accréditation Sans Frontières · PHIG · Sheni Network