Standards › ASF Health Standards v10 › Standard 40
Standard 40
Nutrition and Dietetics
Nutrition and dietetics: qualified nutrition care, individual plans, malnutrition monitoring, texture matched to swallowing, and food safety.
Nutrition assessment and planning are carried out by a qualified dietitian, or by a clinician trained in nutrition, as recognised by the professional body. Scope of practice is defined.
Why it matters. Nutrition care needs the right skill. A qualified dietitian, or a clinician trained for the task, assesses and plans the diet, so that the plan is safe and effective.
How the surveyor verifies this criterion
Sample. Review nutrition assessment and plan records for 20 patients, and staff competence records for those who wrote them.
1. Nutrition assessment is carried out by a qualified dietitian or a trained clinician.
Method. Check each assessment for the author and their qualification.
Evidence to show. Nutrition care by qualified staff (NUT-POL-001).
Pass when. Every assessment is by a qualified or trained clinician.
2. The author’s qualification is on the competence register.
Method. Check each author against the register.
Evidence to show. Nutrition staff competence register (NUT-REG-001).
Pass when. Every author is on the register with a current qualification.
3. Dietitian input is recorded where the plan is complex.
Method. Check each complex case for the dietitian review entry.
Evidence to show. Individual nutrition plan record (NUT-FRM-001).
Pass when. Every complex case has dietitian input recorded.
Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)
- A feeding plan written by an untrained aide with no dietitian input.
Documents
E-learning
No course linked yet.
Planned course: No e-learning course is linked to this criterion yet. A course is planned to cover it.
References
- Volkert, D., Beck, A.M., Cederholm, T., et al. (2019). ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clinical Nutrition, 38(1), 10–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.024
Each patient has a nutrition plan based on a documented assessment of their needs, including any diagnosis, allergy, intolerance, and cultural or religious requirement.
Why it matters. Each patient has different nutritional needs. An individual plan, based on an assessment of their needs, is what keeps them well.
How the surveyor verifies this criterion
Sample. Review nutrition plans for 20 patients, including those with diagnoses, allergies or cultural or religious dietary needs.
1. Each patient has a documented nutrition assessment before the plan.
Method. Check each plan for an assessment dated before it.
Evidence to show. Nutritional risk screening and therapeutic diets (CLN-SOP-003, existing, reused).
Pass when. Every plan is preceded by an assessment.
2. The plan records diagnosis, allergies, intolerances and cultural or religious needs.
Method. Check each plan for the four items.
Evidence to show. Individual nutrition plan record (NUT-FRM-001).
Pass when. Every plan records all four items.
3. The plan is reviewed at the set interval.
Method. Check each plan for the review dates against the interval.
Evidence to show. Nutrition risk screen record (CLN-FRM-005, existing, reused).
Pass when. Every plan is reviewed at the set interval.
Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)
- A diabetic patient given a standard tray with no nutrition plan and no allergy check.
Documents
E-learning
No course linked yet.
Planned course: No e-learning course is linked to this criterion yet. A course is planned to cover it.
References
- Volkert, D., Beck, A.M., Cederholm, T., et al. (2019). ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clinical Nutrition, 38(1), 10–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.024
Malnutrition and risk of malnutrition are identified with a validated tool. Weight and intake are monitored against documented targets, and treatment is adjusted when targets are not met.
Why it matters. Malnutrition slows recovery, weakens the immune system and can kill. Identifying it with a validated tool, and treating it, prevents harm.
How the surveyor verifies this criterion
Sample. Review malnutrition screening and monitoring records for 20 patients admitted in the last 3 months.
1. Each patient is screened for malnutrition with a validated tool.
Method. Check each record for the named tool and its score.
Evidence to show. Malnutrition identification and monitoring (NUT-SOP-001).
Pass when. Every patient has a validated screen recorded.
2. Weight and intake are monitored against documented targets.
Method. Check each record for weight and intake entries against the target.
Evidence to show. Falls, pressure injury and weight register (LTC-REG-001, existing, reused).
Pass when. Every at-risk patient has weight and intake monitored against target.
3. Treatment is started and reviewed when malnutrition is found.
Method. Check each positive screen for the treatment and review.
Evidence to show. Falls, pressure injury and nutrition risk screening (LTC-SOP-001, existing, reused).
Pass when. Every positive screen has treatment and review recorded.
Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)
- A patient losing weight for six weeks with no screen and no monitoring.
Documents
E-learning
- Personal Care & Daily Living (LTC-03)
Planned course: No e-learning course is linked to this criterion yet. A course is planned to cover it.
References
- Volkert, D., Beck, A.M., Cederholm, T., et al. (2019). ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clinical Nutrition, 38(1), 10–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.024
Diet texture and fluid consistency are set from a documented swallowing assessment. The texture is reviewed as the patient’s swallowing changes.
Why it matters. A patient with swallowing difficulty who is given the wrong texture can choke or breathe food into the lungs. The diet must be matched to a documented swallowing assessment.
How the surveyor verifies this criterion
Sample. Review swallowing assessments and texture orders for 15 patients with a swallowing concern.
1. A documented swallowing assessment is on file before the texture is set.
Method. Check each texture order for an assessment dated before it.
Evidence to show. Swallowing assessment and texture record (NUT-FRM-002).
Pass when. Every texture order follows an assessment.
2. Diet texture and fluid consistency match the assessment.
Method. Check each order against the assessment result.
Evidence to show. Diet texture from swallowing assessment (NUT-SOP-002).
Pass when. Every order matches its assessment.
3. The texture is reviewed as swallowing changes.
Method. Check each record for the review and any change made.
Evidence to show. Swallowing assessment and texture record (NUT-FRM-002).
Pass when. Every change in swallowing is followed by a texture review.
Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)
- A patient with a swallowing problem given thin fluids with no assessment.
Documents
E-learning
No course linked yet.
Planned course: No e-learning course is linked to this criterion yet. A course is planned to cover it.
References
- Volkert, D., Beck, A.M., Cederholm, T., et al. (2019). ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clinical Nutrition, 38(1), 10–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.024
Food is prepared, stored and served under documented food safety rules. Staff who handle food are trained, and temperatures and hygiene are checked on a recorded schedule.
Why it matters. Food that is not stored, prepared and served safely causes outbreaks of illness, and vulnerable patients are the most at risk. Documented food safety rules are the basis of safe food.
How the surveyor verifies this criterion
Sample. Review food safety records, temperature logs and staff training for the last 3 months.
1. Food is prepared, stored and served under documented food safety rules.
Method. Check the rules against the practice records sampled.
Evidence to show. Food safety and hygiene (NUT-POL-002).
Pass when. Every sampled practice follows the documented rules.
2. Food handlers are trained and the training is recorded.
Method. Check the training record for each handler.
Evidence to show. Hand hygiene at the point of care (HH-SOP-001, existing, reused).
Pass when. Every handler has training recorded.
3. Temperatures and hygiene are checked and recorded on each shift.
Method. Check each shift for the temperature and hygiene entries.
Evidence to show. Food temperature and hygiene check register (NUT-REG-002).
Pass when. Every shift has temperature and hygiene checks recorded.
Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)
- Food kept at room temperature for hours and served without hygiene checks.
Documents
E-learning
- Food Safety & Hygiene Fundamentals (FOOD-01)
References
- World Health Organization (2006). Five Keys to Safer Food Manual. Geneva: WHO.
Additional resources: guidelines in the GMJ library
These guidelines are held in the GMJ guideline library (news.gmj.ge). WHO and PAHO are the issuing bodies; MSF guidelines are marked MSF.
- Integrated management of obesity in children · WHO · criteria: Whole standard
Integrated primary-care management of childhood obesity; nutrition-related guidance for paediatric patients. - Guidelines on the integrated management of obesity in adolescents · WHO · criteria: Whole standard
Integrated primary-care management of obesity in adolescents aged 10–19 years.
Back to ASF Health Standards v10 · Standards Map · E-learning by standard · References