EDITIONEN·FR·ქართ

Accréditation Sans Frontières

International Accreditation of Healthcare Facilities

The Basis applies to every facility, whatever its size, setting or services. It has four parts: core patient safety (B1), governance and accountability (B2), facility and environment (B3), and the workforce (B4). Each criterion shows how it is checked, the evidence to show, what passes, and what fails immediately.

Basis B1 · applies to every facility

Core Patient Safety

Sixteen criteria that every facility meets, whatever its setting or services. Each criterion shows how it is checked, the evidence to show, what passes, what fails immediately, the e-learning that supports it, and the references behind it.

Criteria on this page

B1.1B1.2B1.3B1.4B1.5B1.6B1.7B1.8B1.9B1.10B1.11B1.12B1.13B1.14B1.15B1.16

Two kinds of document

Means of verification. The forms, logs and policies the surveyor checks. The organisation submits them.

Recommended. SOPs, guidelines and protocols that support good practice. They are held on site but are not verified.

How a surveyor reads each criterion

Statement→
Sample→
Method→
Evidence→
Pass ruleor
Immediate fail

How strict is Basis B1, by setting

Humanitarian settings
9 Essential
7 Recommended
Transition
12 Essential
4 Recommended
Standard
14 Essential
2 Recommended

Of the 13 criteria, the Humanitarian setting has the fewest Essential criteria, and the Standard setting has the most. Each row adds up to 13.

B1.1
Patient Identified at Every Point of Contact

Every patient is verified using at least two identifiers before any medication, procedure, blood product or specimen collection, and at every point where contact could go wrong.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Emergency department: follow 2 patients from arrival to discharge or transfer, one medicine and one specimen each. Ward: follow 2 inpatients through one medicine round and one specimen collection. Records: the last 20 specimen labels and 10 medication charts per area. Staff: interview 3 people (one doctor, one nurse, one phlebotomist or lab staff).

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Two identifiers are checked before every medicine.

Method. Observe one full medicine round. For each dose, see the nurse ask the patient for name and date of birth, or read the wristband, then compare with the medication chart.

Evidence to show. Medication chart for the observed doses; close-up photo of the wristband with identifiers masked and no face in frame.

Pass when. Every observed dose has two identifiers checked with the patient. One exception is a finding.

2. Two identifiers are checked before every specimen collection, with the patient present.

Method. Observe 2 specimen collections (one in ED, one on a ward). Check the label is written at the bedside, in front of the patient.

Evidence to show. Photo of the labelled tube with patient identifiers masked; the matching request form.

Pass when. Both collections are labelled at the bedside with two identifiers, date, time and initials.

3. Identification is checked again before blood products and procedures.

Method. Observe 1 blood transfusion or procedure check (ED or theatre). Check the check is repeated at the bedside, not copied from an earlier entry.

Evidence to show. Signed transfusion or procedure checklist for that patient (identifiers masked).

Pass when. A bedside check with two identifiers is written on the checklist at the time of the procedure.

4. Specimen labels are completed at the point of collection, not later.

Method. Review the last 20 specimen labels against the collection log. Check that the time, date and initials match the collection time.

Evidence to show. Log extract of 20 labels with the check recorded on each (identifiers masked).

Pass when. 20 of 20 labels are complete and match the collection time. Any label written away from the patient is a finding.

5. Every inpatient and ED patient wears a wristband that is present and legible.

Method. Walk the ED and one ward. Check the wristband on the 2 patients followed in the sample, plus 8 others at random.

Evidence to show. Photo of the wristband for each sampled patient, identifiers masked.

Pass when. All 10 patients have a legible wristband with name and date of birth. A missing or illegible wristband is a finding.

6. Staff describe the process correctly.

Method. Ask the 3 staff members: 'How do you confirm who a patient is before giving a medicine or taking a sample?'

Evidence to show. Interview notes (role, answer).

Pass when. Each answer names two identifiers checked with the patient. An answer based on bed, room or the chart alone is a finding.

7. Patients can state their identifiers when asked.

Method. Ask the 2 ED patients and 2 ward patients for their full name and date of birth. If the patient cannot answer, ask a family member and check the wristband.

Evidence to show. Notes of the answer and the wristband check.

Pass when. The patient or the wristband gives the correct full name and date of birth.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A room or bed number is used as the only identifier.
  • A medicine is given or a specimen is taken without two identifiers checked with the patient.
  • A specimen label is written away from the patient.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2007). WHO launches Nine Patient Safety Solutions (Solution 2: patient identification). Geneva: WHO. Open source
B1.2
Hand Hygiene at the Point of Care

Hand hygiene stations are present where care happens, and staff use them. Use is observed, not self-reported.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. ED and two wards. Walk the whole area; observe 20 hand hygiene opportunities per area using the WHO 5 Moments.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Hand hygiene stations are at every point of care, not only at ward entrances.

Method. Walk every bed space and treatment room. Count stations within arm's reach of each bed.

Evidence to show. Walk-round checklist with station count and photo of the bed-side station (no patients in frame).

Pass when. A working station, with soap or alcohol rub and paper towels, is within arm's reach of every bed space.

2. Staff use hand hygiene at the 5 Moments.

Method. Observe unannounced, at 20 opportunities per area. Record the moment and whether hands were cleaned.

Evidence to show. Observation tally sheet (no names).

Pass when. At least 80% of observed opportunities are followed by hand hygiene.

3. Supply is continuous.

Method. Check stock levels and dispenser refill records at each area.

Evidence to show. Refill log for the last 30 days.

Pass when. No area has been without product for more than one shift in the last 30 days.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No hand hygiene product at the point of care in any sampled area.
  • Compliance is recorded only by self-report.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2009). WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. Geneva: WHO.
  2. World Health Organization (2009). My 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene. Geneva: WHO.
B1.3
Informed Consent Before Significant Care

Informed consent explains risks, benefits and alternatives before every significant procedure. It is a conversation the patient can describe back, not a form signed on the way in.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Ask 3 patients who had a significant procedure in the last month. Review 10 consent records.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Consent covers risks, benefits and alternatives.

Method. Review 10 consent records for significant procedures. Check that each names the risks, benefits and at least one alternative.

Evidence to show. Consent forms with the discussion section filled in (identifiers masked).

Pass when. All 10 record risks, benefits and an alternative, not only the procedure name.

2. The patient can describe the procedure in their own words.

Method. Ask the 3 patients what the procedure involves, what the main risk is, and what else could be done.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each patient gives an accurate description of at least two of the three points.

3. Consent is obtained by a trained person, not a form alone.

Method. Ask 2 staff who take consent how they confirm understanding.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each describes a conversation with teach-back, not a signature alone.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A significant procedure is performed with no recorded consent.
  • Consent is taken from a patient who lacks capacity without the legal pathway being followed.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. Council of Europe (1997). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine (Oviedo Convention), Article 5. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  2. World Health Organization (2011). Patient Safety Curriculum Guide: Multi-professional Edition. Geneva: WHO.
B1.4
Falls Are Assessed and Prevented

Every patient's risk of falling is assessed on admission and after any change in condition, and measures are in place for patients at risk. The patient has the right to be told about their fall risk and to take part in the prevention plan (see Standard 61).

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review 10 admission records and 5 records after a change in condition. Walk 2 wards and 1 ED area.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Falls risk is assessed on admission and after any change in condition.

Method. Review 10 admission records and 5 records after a change in condition.

Evidence to show. Falls assessment entries (identifiers masked).

Pass when. Each record has an assessment on admission, and after each recorded change.

2. Measures are in place for patients at risk.

Method. For each at-risk patient in the sample, check the measures are in place: call-bell in reach, lighting, footwear, supervision or equipment.

Evidence to show. Photo of the bed area showing the measures (no patient in frame).

Pass when. Every at-risk patient in the sample has at least one visible measure in place.

3. Staff know the falls process.

Method. Ask 3 staff what they do when a patient is assessed as at risk.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each describes the assessment and at least one measure.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A patient at risk has no assessment recorded on admission.
  • A patient who has fallen has no reassessment recorded.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2017). Step Safely: Strategies for Preventing and Managing Falls Across the Care Continuum. Geneva: WHO.
B1.5
Non-Discrimination in Access to Care

Care is provided without discrimination on grounds of race, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, nationality, migration status or ability to pay for emergency care. Reasonable adjustments are made for disability.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Interview 3 patients from different groups. Review the admission and referral policy and 10 referral records.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. The admission and referral policy states non-discrimination.

Method. Read the policy. Check it names each protected ground in the statement.

Evidence to show. Policy with the relevant section highlighted.

Pass when. The policy names race, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, nationality, migration status and ability.

2. Patients are not refused or moved on grounds listed in the policy.

Method. Review 10 refusal or referral records and the reason given.

Evidence to show. Referral log extract (identifiers masked).

Pass when. No refusal or transfer is recorded on a ground listed in the policy.

3. Patients can request an interpreter or accessible format.

Method. Ask 3 patients whether they were offered an interpreter or accessible format when they needed one.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each patient who needed support was offered it, or was not in need.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A patient is refused care on a ground listed in the policy.
  • No policy on non-discrimination exists.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. United Nations (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Article 25. New York: UN.
  2. World Health Organization (2021). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030. Geneva: WHO.
B1.6
Emergency Access and Fire Safety

The emergency entrance is marked, lit and kept clear. Fire safety equipment is tested on schedule, and an evacuation drill has been run with staff.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Walk the emergency entrance, the ED and one ward. Review the last fire drill record.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. The emergency entrance is marked, lit and kept clear.

Method. Walk the route from the entrance to the ED. Check signage, lighting and obstruction.

Evidence to show. Photo of the entrance (no people in frame).

Pass when. Marked, lit and clear at the time of the walk.

2. Fire safety equipment is tested on schedule.

Method. Review the test records for extinguishers, alarms and emergency lighting.

Evidence to show. Test log for the last 12 months.

Pass when. Every item was tested within its scheduled interval.

3. Staff have run an evacuation drill.

Method. Review the drill record and ask 3 staff what they do on the alarm.

Evidence to show. Drill report and interview notes.

Pass when. A drill has been run in the last 12 months, and staff describe the process.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • The emergency entrance is blocked.
  • No fire test record exists for the last 12 months.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. National Fire Protection Association (2024). NFPA 101: Life Safety Code. Quincy, MA: NFPA.
  2. World Health Organization (2015). Hospital Safety Index: Guide for Evaluators. Geneva: WHO.
B1.7
Patients Know Their Rights

A patient rights charter is displayed where patients pass, and patients can describe their rights in their own words. The charter names privacy, dignity, confidentiality, personal safety, consent, the right to refuse treatment, and the patient's cultural and spiritual preferences.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Ask 3 patients. Check the charter at 3 entry points.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. The patient rights charter is displayed where patients pass.

Method. Walk the entry, waiting area and ward corridor. Check the charter is visible at each.

Evidence to show. Photo of the charter display (no people in frame).

Pass when. Displayed at all three points, in the languages the service uses.

2. The charter names privacy, dignity, confidentiality, information and choice.

Method. Read the charter.

Evidence to show. Copy of the charter.

Pass when. All five are named.

3. Patients can describe their rights in their own words.

Method. Ask 3 patients to name two rights.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each names at least two rights correctly.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No charter is displayed.
  • The charter does not name patient privacy.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (1994). Declaration on the Promotion of Patients' Rights in Europe. Amsterdam: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
B1.8
Staff Are Qualified, Verified and Current

Every clinical staff member's qualifications are verified directly with the issuing body and rechecked on renewal. Each new clinical staff member receives structured orientation before practising independently. This includes agency staff, volunteers and every other member of the workforce, checked against the scope of practice their role requires.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review 10 staff files across clinical roles, and 3 new starters from the last 6 months.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Qualifications are verified with the issuing body.

Method. Review 10 staff files. Check each qualification has a verification record from the issuer.

Evidence to show. Verification record for each file (names masked).

Pass when. All 10 have a verification record dated from the issuer.

2. Registration is current.

Method. Check the registration expiry date for each file.

Evidence to show. Register extract.

Pass when. No registration has expired without renewal.

3. New starters receive structured induction.

Method. Review the induction record for the 3 newest staff.

Evidence to show. Induction checklist signed by the supervisor.

Pass when. Each new starter has a signed checklist covering the core safety criteria.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A clinical staff member works with an expired or unverified qualification.
  • No structured induction is recorded for a new clinical starter.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2010). WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel. Geneva: WHO.
B1.9
Medicines Are Prescribed, Stored and Given Safely

Prescriptions are complete and legible, high-risk medicines have a defined second check by a trained, designated person, and medicines are stored at the correct temperature and secured.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Observe one medicine round. Review 10 prescriptions and the storage of the medicine fridge and cabinet.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Prescriptions are complete and legible.

Method. Review 10 prescriptions for name, date of birth, dose, route, frequency and prescriber signature.

Evidence to show. Prescription copies (identifiers masked).

Pass when. All 10 are complete and legible.

2. High-risk medicines have a second check by a trained, designated person.

Method. Observe the preparation of one high-risk medicine, and check the designated list.

Evidence to show. Second-check record.

Pass when. The second check is recorded and performed by a named, trained person.

3. Medicines are stored at the correct temperature.

Method. Read the temperature log for the fridge and the cabinet for the last 30 days.

Evidence to show. Temperature log extract.

Pass when. Every reading is within range, and any excursion has a recorded action.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A medicine is given without a legible prescription.
  • A high-risk medicine is given without the second check.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2017). Medication Without Harm: Global Patient Safety Challenge. Geneva: WHO.
  2. World Health Organization (2011). Patient Safety Curriculum Guide: Multi-professional Edition. Geneva: WHO.
B1.10
Sharps and Clinical Waste Are Handled Safely

Sharps containers are at the point of use, never overfilled, and clinical waste is segregated correctly at disposal.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Walk every treatment room and clinical area. Check the disposal route for one day.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Sharps containers are at the point of use.

Method. Walk every treatment room and clinical area. Count containers at each point of use.

Evidence to show. Walk-round checklist with photos (no people in frame).

Pass when. A container is at each point where sharps are used.

2. Containers are not overfilled.

Method. Check the fill line on each container.

Evidence to show. Photo of each container sampled.

Pass when. No container is above the fill line.

3. Waste is segregated at disposal.

Method. Follow one day's waste from a ward to the store.

Evidence to show. Segregation record and photo of the store.

Pass when. Infectious, sharps, general and pharmaceutical waste are separated and labelled.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A sharps container is overfilled and in use.
  • Infectious and general waste are mixed at disposal.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

  • No course linked yet.
  • Planned course: Sharps and clinical waste. New course planned.

References

  1. World Health Organization (2014). Safe Management of Wastes from Health-Care Activities, 2nd edition. Geneva: WHO.
B1.11
Records Are Complete and Private, and Incidents and Complaints Are Acted On

Patient records are complete, kept secure and private for the period the law requires, and incidents and complaints are acted on.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the last 20 patient records and the last 20 incidents or complaints. Interview 2 patients.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Records contain all mandatory elements.

Method. Review 20 records against the mandatory list.

Evidence to show. Audit tool with the 20 records (identifiers masked).

Pass when. At least 18 of 20 are complete.

2. Patient information is kept private in practice.

Method. Observe a clinical conversation and a screen. Check whether others can see or hear the patient information.

Evidence to show. Photo of the screen placement (no people in frame).

Pass when. Information cannot be seen or overheard from the waiting area.

3. Incidents and complaints are reviewed and answered.

Method. Review the last 20 incidents or complaints for review, reply, and any change in practice.

Evidence to show. Incident log extract.

Pass when. Each has a review and a reply, and any needed change is recorded.

4. Records are kept securely for the required period.

Method. Check the retention schedule against the required period, and check that access to records is restricted to authorised staff.

Evidence to show. Retention schedule; access control list (no patient data).

Pass when. The schedule matches the required period, and access is restricted to authorised staff.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • Patient information is visible to other patients or the public as a routine.
  • Incidents are logged but never reviewed.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2009). Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety. Geneva: WHO.
  2. International Organization for Standardization (2022). ISO 15189:2022 Medical laboratories: Requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: ISO.
B1.12
Patients Learn, Decide and Shape the Service

Patients are offered real choices and taught what they need to manage their own care. Their preferences and decisions are recorded. Patients and carers take part in improving the service through a patient council that has written terms of reference and whose advice is recorded with the facility's response.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Recommended

Sample. Interview 3 patients. Review the patient feedback and decision records for 10 patients.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Patients are offered real choices.

Method. Review 10 records where options were discussed.

Evidence to show. Decision records (identifiers masked).

Pass when. Options and the chosen one are recorded in each sampled record.

2. Patients are taught what they need to manage their own care.

Method. Ask 3 patients what they were taught about their condition or treatment.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each describes at least one thing they were taught.

3. Patients and carers take part in shaping the service.

Method. Ask the service for the last patient or carer input and the change it led to.

Evidence to show. Meeting minutes or feedback log.

Pass when. At least one recorded change came from patient or carer input in the last 12 months.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A patient's stated preference is not recorded or considered in a decision.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030. Geneva: WHO.
  2. World Health Organization (2011). Patient Safety Curriculum Guide: Multi-professional Edition. Geneva: WHO.
B1.13
Service Scope Is Declared

The organisation declares, in writing, the setting it is accredited under and every service it provides under that setting, including the transport modes, routes and countries where a transfer service is provided, and the age groups served. The declaration is published to patients and the public and is reviewed at least once a year. A service that is not declared is not provided under the accreditation.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Recommended

Sample. Review the accreditation scope statement and the service list. Compare with 3 service sites.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. The setting is declared in writing.

Method. Read the scope statement.

Evidence to show. Scope statement.

Pass when. The setting under which the service is accredited is named.

2. Every service is listed.

Method. Compare the list with the services observed on the site walk.

Evidence to show. Service list and site walk checklist.

Pass when. Every observed service appears on the list, and no listed service is missing from the site.

3. Transport modes and routes are declared where relevant.

Method. Review the transport section of the scope.

Evidence to show. Scope statement extract.

Pass when. Each mode and route used is declared.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A service is provided that is not declared.
  • No written scope exists.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

  • No course linked yet.
  • Planned course: Declaring the service scope. New course planned.

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems: Requirements, clause 4.3 (scope). Geneva: ISO.
B1.14
Children and Adults Are Protected From Abuse and Neglect

Every facility has a written safeguarding policy that covers children and adults. Staff know how to recognise and report abuse and neglect, every concern is recorded, referred and followed up, and the named safeguarding lead is known to all staff.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the safeguarding concern register for the last 12 months, and interview 3 staff chosen at random.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. A written safeguarding policy covers children and adults.

Method. Read the policy. Check it names the referral route and a safeguarding lead.

Evidence to show. Approved policy with version and date.

Pass when. Policy approved, covers children and adults, names a referral route and a lead.

2. Staff can recognise and report abuse and neglect.

Method. Ask 3 staff what they would do if they suspected abuse. Check the training record for the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Interview notes; training record.

Pass when. Each describes the report route, and at least 90% of patient-facing staff have training recorded.

3. Every concern is recorded, referred and followed up.

Method. Check each concern in the register for a referral record and a recorded outcome.

Evidence to show. Safeguarding concern register (identifiers masked).

Pass when. Every concern has a referral record and a recorded outcome.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A suspected case of abuse or neglect is not reported.
  • A concern has no record of referral or outcome.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

  • No course linked yet.
  • Planned course: Safeguarding course for health facilities (adults and children) planned.

References

  1. United Nations (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 19. New York: UN.
  2. United Nations (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Article 16. New York: UN.
B1.15
Infection Is Prevented Through a Written Programme

The facility has a written infection prevention and control programme with a named lead. It covers hand hygiene, isolation of infected patients, cleaning, sterile technique and surveillance of healthcare-associated infection, and is reviewed at least once a year.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the programme and the surveillance report for the last 12 months. Walk 2 wards and 1 procedure area.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. A written IPC programme exists with a named lead.

Method. Read the programme. Check it names a lead and shows a review in the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Approved IPC programme with review date.

Pass when. Approved, names a lead, reviewed in the last 12 months.

2. Hand hygiene and isolation work at the point of care.

Method. Observe 20 hand hygiene opportunities per area. Check isolation signs and supplies in each area.

Evidence to show. Observation tally (no names); photo of isolation signage (no patient in frame).

Pass when. At least 80% of observed opportunities are met, and isolation supplies are present in every area.

3. Healthcare-associated infections are counted and acted on.

Method. Check the surveillance report for the last 12 months and the action taken on each cluster.

Evidence to show. Surveillance report and action log.

Pass when. The report is produced at least quarterly, and each cluster has a recorded action.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • There is no written IPC programme or named lead.
  • A cluster of infections has no recorded investigation or action.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2016). Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programmes at the national and acute health care facility level. Geneva: WHO.
B1.16
Care Is Handed Over Safely Between Clinicians

Every handover of patient care between clinicians uses a structured method, covers the key information, and is confirmed by the receiver. Full requirements are in Standard 63 (Safe Handover).

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Observe 5 handovers on 2 wards across a shift change. Review the handover records for 20 patient moves in the last 3 months.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Each handover uses a structured method.

Method. Observe handovers and check each against SBAR or I-PASS.

Evidence to show. Observation checklist (no names).

Pass when. Every observed handover follows a structured method, matching Standard 63.1.

2. The receiver confirms the key information.

Method. Check the handover record for read-back and both signatures.

Evidence to show. Handover record (HOS-FRM-004).

Pass when. Every sampled record has read-back and both signatures.

3. Patient moves carry a written handover.

Method. Check each sampled move for a written handover sent with the patient.

Evidence to show. Transfer record with handover.

Pass when. Every sampled move has a written handover.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A patient is moved or transferred with no handover given.
  • A deteriorating patient is handed over with no escalation plan.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2007). Communication during patient handovers. Geneva: WHO.

Basis B2 · applies to every facility

Governance and Safety Culture

Sixteen criteria that every facility meets, whatever its setting or services. They set out who is accountable, how policy and records are kept, and how the board and patients take part in governance. Each criterion shows how it is checked, the evidence to show, what passes, what fails immediately, the e-learning that supports it, and the references behind it.

Criteria on this page

B2.1B2.2B2.3B2.6B2.7B2.8B2.9B2.10B2.11B2.12B2.13B2.14B2.15B2.16B2.17B2.18

Two kinds of document

Means of verification. The forms, logs and policies the surveyor checks. The organisation submits them.

Recommended. SOPs, guidelines and protocols that support good practice. They are held on site but are not verified.

How a surveyor reads each criterion

Statement→
Sample→
Method→
Evidence→
Pass ruleor
Immediate fail

How strict is Basis B1, by setting

Humanitarian settings
8 Essential
8 Recommended
Transition
8 Essential
8 Recommended
Standard
16 Essential
0 Recommended

Of the criteria on this page, the Humanitarian setting has the fewest Essential criteria, and the Standard setting has the most. Each row adds up to the total number of criteria on this page.

B2.1
A Named Person Is Accountable for the Service

One named person holds documented accountability for the safety and quality of the service, and can be identified by staff and patients. Where the provider has an owner or board, that body is named instead, with the same accountability.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the service structure and the job description of the named person, and interview 3 staff.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. One named person is accountable for the service.

Method. Check the organisation chart and the job description for the named person.

Evidence to show. Organisation chart and job description (names as appropriate).

Pass when. The named person is in both documents and has signed the annual declaration.

2. The named person has the authority to act.

Method. Review the delegated authority record for the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Delegation record.

Pass when. Authority for decisions on safety and staffing is recorded.

3. Staff know who is accountable.

Method. Ask 3 staff who is accountable for the service.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each names the same person.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No named person is recorded for the service.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030: Towards Eliminating Avoidable Harm in Health Care. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B2.2
The Service Has a Written Operating Plan and Policies

The service has a short written plan that says what it provides, for whom, and how it keeps people safe, together with the policies that follow from it. The plan is reviewed at least once a year.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the operating plan and the policy list. Check the approval records for each policy.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. A written operating plan exists and is approved.

Method. Read the operating plan and check the approval date.

Evidence to show. Approved operating plan.

Pass when. Approved within the last 12 months and signed by the named person.

2. Policies are written, approved and listed.

Method. Compare the policy register with the policies on file.

Evidence to show. Policy register extract.

Pass when. Every policy on the register is on file and approved.

3. Policies are reviewed on a set schedule.

Method. Check each policy review date.

Evidence to show. Policy review dates.

Pass when. No policy is overdue for review.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • The service has no written operating plan.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030: Towards Eliminating Avoidable Harm in Health Care. Geneva: WHO. Open source
  2. International Organization for Standardization (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems: Requirements. Geneva: ISO. Open source
B2.3
Policies Are Followed in Practice

Written policies are followed in daily practice, and departures are noticed and corrected.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Choose 5 policies from the register. Audit each in practice.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Policies are followed in practice.

Method. For each of the 5 policies, observe the practice or review records of it.

Evidence to show. Policy application audit form for each policy.

Pass when. At least 70% compliance in each audited policy.

2. Gaps lead to action.

Method. Review the actions taken after any audit gap.

Evidence to show. Audit action record.

Pass when. Each gap has a named action and a close date.

3. Staff know the key policies.

Method. Ask 3 staff to name the policy for one key task.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each names the correct policy.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A policy is in place but no one follows it, and no audit has been done.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems: Requirements. Geneva: ISO. Open source
B2.6
Serious Incidents Are Investigated

Every serious incident is investigated, with the findings and any change in practice recorded.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the last 5 serious incidents from the incident log.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Serious incidents are investigated.

Method. Review the investigation for each of the 5 incidents.

Evidence to show. Root cause analysis record for each.

Pass when. Each has a recorded investigation.

2. Investigations are completed on time.

Method. Check the dates from incident to investigation close.

Evidence to show. Incident action tracker.

Pass when. Each investigation is closed within the target set in the policy.

3. Learning is shared.

Method. Ask 2 staff what changed after one investigation.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each can describe one change that followed.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A serious incident has no investigation recorded.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2020). Patient Safety Incident Reporting and Learning Systems: Technical Report and Guidance. Geneva: WHO. ISBN 9789240010338. Open source
  2. World Health Organization (2009). The Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B2.7
Patients Are Asked for Feedback at Least Once a Year

The service asks its patients and families for feedback at least once a year, and records what it changed as a result.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the annual feedback questionnaire and results for the last 12 months.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Patients are asked for feedback at least once a year.

Method. Review the feedback questionnaire and its dates.

Evidence to show. Questionnaire and the date it was issued.

Pass when. Issued at least once in the last 12 months.

2. Results are summarised and shared.

Method. Read the summary and check where it was shared.

Evidence to show. Feedback summary.

Pass when. Summary exists and has gone to governance.

3. Feedback leads to action.

Method. Review the actions taken from the feedback.

Evidence to show. Action record.

Pass when. At least one action was taken from the last cycle.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • The service has never asked patients for feedback.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030: Towards Eliminating Avoidable Harm in Health Care. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B2.8
The Board Is Accountable

A governing body exists, with named members and clear, documented authority over safety and quality, clinical governance, and financial stewardship — not an informal ownership arrangement functioning without oversight structure.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the governing body minutes for the last 12 months.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. The board is accountable for safety and quality.

Method. Review the terms of reference.

Evidence to show. Terms of reference.

Pass when. Safety and quality are named in the board responsibilities.

2. The board makes decisions on safety and quality.

Method. Read the minutes for the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Minutes and decision log.

Pass when. At least one decision on safety or quality is recorded in each quarter.

3. Membership is current.

Method. Check the register of members.

Evidence to show. Register of board members.

Pass when. The register is current and signed.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • The board has no recorded decision on safety or quality in the last 12 months.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030: Towards Eliminating Avoidable Harm in Health Care. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B2.9
There Is a Written Strategic Plan

A documented plan states the facility's mission, values, and a code of conduct for staff behaviour, and guides resourcing decisions — not a one-page mission poster disconnected from how money and staff time get allocated, and not a mission statement with no accompanying statement of values or expected conduct.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the current strategic plan and its review record.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. A written strategic plan exists and is approved.

Method. Read the plan and check its approval.

Evidence to show. Approved strategic plan.

Pass when. Approved and signed by the board.

2. The plan includes safety and quality goals.

Method. Read the plan for safety and quality goals.

Evidence to show. Plan extract.

Pass when. Measurable safety and quality goals are named.

3. The plan is reviewed each year.

Method. Check the review record.

Evidence to show. Review minutes.

Pass when. Reviewed within the last 12 months.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No written strategic plan exists.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems: Requirements. Geneva: ISO. Open source
B2.10
Safety Culture Is Measured

The safety culture of the service is measured with a validated tool at least once a year, and the results lead to a recorded action plan.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the last survey, its results and the action plan. Interview 3 staff.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. A safety culture survey is run at least once a year.

Method. Review the survey procedure and the date of the last survey.

Evidence to show. Survey procedure and the survey report.

Pass when. Survey run within the last 12 months with a validated tool.

2. Results are reported to governance.

Method. Read the minutes where the results were discussed.

Evidence to show. Governance minutes.

Pass when. Results were presented to the board or governing committee.

3. Results lead to a recorded action plan.

Method. Review the safety culture action plan register.

Evidence to show. Action plan register extract.

Pass when. At least one action from the results has an owner and a date.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No safety culture survey has been run in the last 12 months.
  • Results have been collected but no action plan exists.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS). Rockville, MD: AHRQ. Open source
  2. World Health Organization (2021). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030: Towards Eliminating Avoidable Harm in Health Care. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B2.11
Patient Experience Is Measured Continuously, Not Only After Discharge

Patient experience is measured through structured, ongoing feedback during the course of care — not only through the post-discharge complaint channel required elsewhere in this document, which by definition only captures concerns raised after the fact.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the last 3 months of in-stay feedback and the quarterly summary.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Patient experience is measured during the stay.

Method. Review the in-stay feedback form and the completed forms for the last 3 months.

Evidence to show. In-stay feedback form and completed forms.

Pass when. Forms are collected during the stay, not only after discharge.

2. Results are summarised each quarter.

Method. Read the quarterly summary.

Evidence to show. Quarterly summary.

Pass when. A summary exists for each quarter.

3. Results are acted on.

Method. Review one action taken from a result.

Evidence to show. Action record.

Pass when. At least one action was taken from the results.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • Patient experience is measured only after discharge, with no in-stay measure.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030: Towards Eliminating Avoidable Harm in Health Care. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B2.12
An Ethics Consultation Process Exists

Staff facing an ethical dilemma in patient care have access to a usable ethics consultation process — a committee, a named resource, or an external arrangement — not left to resolve difficult cases alone or through informal corridor conversations.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the ethics consultation log for the last 12 months.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. An ethics consultation process exists.

Method. Read the policy and terms of reference.

Evidence to show. Policy and terms of reference.

Pass when. Policy is approved and names the process.

2. Consultations are logged.

Method. Review the consultation log.

Evidence to show. Ethics consultation log.

Pass when. Each consultation has a date, a question and an outcome.

3. Staff know how to request one.

Method. Ask 2 clinicians how to request a consultation.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each describes the route.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No ethics consultation process exists.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030: Towards Eliminating Avoidable Harm in Health Care. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B2.13
Patients and Families Have a Voice in Governance

At least one patient or family representative has a structured role in quality review or governance discussions — not a governance and quality structure that is entirely staff and board-facing, with patient input arriving only indirectly through complaints or surveys.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the attendance register and one decision influenced by a patient representative.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Patients and families have a voice in governance.

Method. Review the governance terms of reference.

Evidence to show. Terms of reference naming the patient representative.

Pass when. A patient or family representative role is named.

2. Representatives attend.

Method. Review the attendance register for the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Attendance register.

Pass when. At least half of meetings were attended.

3. Their input changes a decision.

Method. Find one decision recorded after representative input.

Evidence to show. Minutes.

Pass when. At least one recorded decision followed representative input.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No patient or family representative takes part in governance.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030: Towards Eliminating Avoidable Harm in Health Care. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B2.14
Patients Are Told Openly When Harm Happens

When a patient is harmed by their care, the facility tells the patient and, where appropriate, their family promptly. It explains what happened and what will be done, apologises, and records that the disclosure was made. Staff are supported to do this.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review every incident classed as harm in the last 12 months, and the disclosure record for each. Interview 3 managers.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Every harm incident is disclosed to the patient.

Method. Compare the list of harm incidents with the disclosure record for each.

Evidence to show. Incident register and disclosure record (identifiers masked).

Pass when. Every incident classed as harm has a disclosure record with the date and the person told.

2. Disclosure is timely and open.

Method. Check the time from the incident to the disclosure, and that each record shows what happened, what will happen next, and an apology.

Evidence to show. Disclosure record.

Pass when. At least 90% of disclosures are made within the timescale set in policy, and each record shows all three elements.

3. Staff are supported and the policy is known.

Method. Interview 3 managers: how they would disclose, and what support they receive.

Evidence to show. Interview notes; written policy.

Pass when. A written policy exists, and each manager describes the steps and the support available.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A patient harmed by care is not told.
  • A disclosure is made with no apology and no account of what happens next.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021). Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030: Towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. Geneva: WHO.
  2. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (1994). Declaration on the Promotion of Patients' Rights in Europe. Amsterdam: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
B2.15
Digital Care Systems Follow an Assessment and Management Process

Before any digital care system — telehealth platform, remote monitoring tool, patient-facing app — is introduced, the facility assesses its costs and benefits, manages its implementation, and continues to manage it afterwards — not adopted because a vendor made a compelling pitch, with no internal evaluation.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the assessment record for each digital care system in use or planned in the last 12 months.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Every digital care system is assessed before use.

Method. List the digital systems in use and check each has an assessment record.

Evidence to show. Digital tool assessment template and completed assessments.

Pass when. Every system in use has a completed assessment dated before its introduction.

2. The assessment covers safety, data and access.

Method. Read 3 assessments for those three areas.

Evidence to show. Digital tool assessment template.

Pass when. All three areas are covered in each sampled assessment.

3. Testing and support are arranged.

Method. Check the test and support record for the sampled systems.

Evidence to show. Digital system test and support record.

Pass when. Each system has a recorded test and a named support route.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A digital care system is in use with no assessment.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021). Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. Geneva: WHO. Open source
  2. World Health Organization (2019). WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B2.16
Digital Care Never Disadvantages a Patient Who Cannot Use It

A process ensures that patients who cannot use digital devices, lack internet access, or are otherwise unable to engage with digital approaches are never disadvantaged by the facility's use of digital care — not digital convenience for most patients purchased at the cost of access for the patients least able to adapt.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the digital alternatives record and the access process. Ask 3 patients who do not use digital tools how they book and receive care.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. An alternative route exists for every digital service.

Method. List each digital service and check a non-digital route is recorded.

Evidence to show. Digital care access and alternatives procedure.

Pass when. Every digital service has a non-digital alternative in the procedure.

2. Alternatives are used and recorded.

Method. Check the alternative records for the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Digital alternative record.

Pass when. Alternatives used are recorded for every case where a digital route was not possible.

3. Patients are not disadvantaged.

Method. Ask the 3 patients whether they can book and receive care without a device.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each patient can get care through an alternative route.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A patient without a device or internet cannot book or receive care.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

  • No course linked yet.
  • Planned course: Digital inclusion: care that never disadvantages a patient who cannot use digital tools. New course planned.

References

  1. World Health Organization (2019). WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: WHO. Open source
  2. World Health Organization (2021). Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B2.17
Patients Are Informed When Their Care Involves AI

A patient whose care involves an aspect delivered with AI system support is informed of this — not left to assume every decision was made by a human clinician alone, with disclosure treated as optional rather than a standard part of informed care.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the patient information on AI-supported care and 10 patient records where AI support was used.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Patients are told when AI supports their care.

Method. Check the 10 sampled records for a recorded notice.

Evidence to show. Patient information on AI-supported care (template) and the record of the notice.

Pass when. At least 70% of the sampled records have a recorded notice.

2. The information is available to patients.

Method. Check the patient information is on display or in the patient leaflet.

Evidence to show. Patient information on AI-supported care.

Pass when. The information is displayed in the facility and available on request.

3. Patients can ask questions.

Method. Ask 3 patients whether they were told about AI support in their care.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each patient who was told can say what the AI support was.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A patient's care involved AI support and the patient was not told.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. Geneva: WHO. Open source
  2. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission (2023). ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Information technology: Artificial intelligence management system. Geneva: ISO/IEC. Open source
B2.18
AI Systems Are Governed, Monitored and Introduced With Staff Involvement

AI systems are introduced after staff consultation, monitored for unintended consequences, and have a named accountable owner.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the AI policy, the assessment and monitoring register, and the staff consultation record for each AI system in use.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Staff are consulted before an AI system is introduced.

Method. Check the consultation record for each AI system in use.

Evidence to show. Staff consultation record.

Pass when. Every AI system in use has a consultation record dated before introduction.

2. AI systems are monitored.

Method. Review the monitoring register for the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. AI monitoring register.

Pass when. Each system has monitoring entries at least quarterly, with unintended effects recorded.

3. Each AI system has a named owner.

Method. Check the assessment for a named accountable owner.

Evidence to show. AI system assessment.

Pass when. Every AI system in use has a named owner in the assessment.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • An AI system is in use with no named owner.
  • An AI system was introduced with no staff consultation.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission (2023). ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Information technology: Artificial intelligence management system. Geneva: ISO/IEC. Open source
  2. World Health Organization (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. Geneva: WHO. Open source
  3. International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: ISO. Open source

Basis B3 · applies to every facility

Facility, Environment and Sustainability

Nine criteria that every facility meets, whatever its setting or services. They cover access, water, equipment, cleaning, risk, signage, back-up services, endoscope reprocessing and the environmental and climate commitments of the facility. Each criterion shows how it is checked, the evidence to show, what passes, what fails immediately, the e-learning that supports it, and the references behind it.

Criteria on this page

B3.1B3.2B3.3B3.4B3.5B3.6B3.8B3.9B3.10

Two kinds of document

Means of verification. The forms, logs, registers, plans and policies the surveyor checks. The organisation submits them.

Recommended. SOPs, guidelines and protocols that support good practice. They are held on site but are not verified.

How a surveyor reads each criterion

Statement→
Sample→
Method→
Evidence→
Pass ruleor
Immediate fail

How strict is Basis B3, by setting

Humanitarian settings
6 Essential
3 Recommended
Transition
6 Essential
3 Recommended
Standard
9 Essential
0 Recommended

Each row adds up to the total number of criteria on this page.

B3.1
Reception Desk Accessibility

Non-negotiable

At least one reception or registration point is at a height a wheelchair user can approach and communicate with the receptionist at eye level — not looking up at a standard-height counter designed only for someone standing.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Walk the reception area with a wheelchair user or a measuring tape. Observe 2 registrations.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. At least one reception point is at wheelchair height.

Method. Measure the height of the lowest usable section of the counter.

Evidence to show. Accessibility check record with the measurement.

Pass when. Measured height is within the range set in the accessibility standard, with a clear approach in front.

2. A wheelchair user can speak to the receptionist at eye level.

Method. Observe a registration at the accessible point, or run a test with a staff member seated.

Evidence to show. Observation note or photo of the point in use.

Pass when. The receptionist and the patient can speak at a similar eye level.

3. The accessible section is kept clear.

Method. Check the accessible section on the day of the walk.

Evidence to show. Walk-round checklist.

Pass when. No files, equipment or signage block the section in at least 70% of checks over the last 30 days.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • The only reception counter is above the height a wheelchair user can reach.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization and World Bank (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B3.2
Waiting and Queue Time Is Actively Managed

Standard

Patients waiting for registration, triage, or an ambulatory appointment are managed through a defined queue system with visible, honest wait-time information — rather than leaving patients unsure how long they will wait or whether they have been forgotten.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the queue log for the last 30 days (about 100 patients or all if fewer). Observe the waiting area for one session.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. A defined queue system is in use.

Method. Observe the registration and triage points during one session.

Evidence to show. Queue system description and a photo of the number system.

Pass when. A numbered or tracked system is used for every registration and triage.

2. Wait-time information is shared with patients.

Method. Check the wait-time board or the staff script used at the desk.

Evidence to show. Photo of the board or script.

Pass when. Expected wait is shown or stated for at least 70% of patients in the observation.

3. Patients waiting too long are checked on.

Method. Review the queue log for patients waiting beyond the set time.

Evidence to show. Queue log extract with arrival and seen times.

Pass when. At least 70% of patients who waited beyond the set time were checked on, with the check recorded.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No queue system exists and patients are seen in an unknown order with no information.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2017). Hospital Safety Index: Guide for Evaluators, second edition. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B3.3
Water Supply Is Safe and Monitored

Non-negotiable

Water quality is tested on a defined schedule and a contingency plan exists for interruption — not an assumption that municipal supply is automatically safe.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the water test records for the last 12 months and the contingency plan. Check the water outlets on the day of assessment.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Water is tested on a defined schedule.

Method. Review the test schedule and the test records for the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Water test record and the schedule.

Pass when. At least 70% of scheduled tests were done on time, and the results were recorded.

2. Results are acted on.

Method. Review the actions taken after any out-of-range result.

Evidence to show. Corrective action record.

Pass when. Every out-of-range result has a recorded action and a re-test.

3. A contingency plan exists for water interruption.

Method. Read the plan and check its last review date.

Evidence to show. Water interruption contingency plan.

Pass when. Plan is approved, covers storage and alternative supply, and was reviewed in the last 12 months.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No water test has been done in the last 12 months.
  • An out-of-range result has no recorded action.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2011). Guidelines for drinking-water quality, fourth edition. Geneva: WHO. Open source
  2. World Health Organization and UNICEF (2019). WASH in health care facilities: Practical steps to achieve universal access to quality care. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B3.4
Medical Equipment Is Maintained on Schedule

Non-negotiable

A maintenance programme covers all clinical equipment on a defined schedule, and faulty equipment is removed from use, not kept in service pending eventual repair.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the equipment register and the service records for 20 clinical devices chosen at random. Check the out-of-use tags on the day of assessment.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. All clinical equipment is on the register.

Method. Compare the register with a walk-round of clinical areas.

Evidence to show. Equipment inventory and service log.

Pass when. At least 70% of clinical equipment seen on the walk is on the register.

2. Servicing is done on schedule.

Method. Check the service dates for the 20 sampled devices.

Evidence to show. Service log extract.

Pass when. At least 70% of the sampled devices were serviced within their scheduled interval.

3. Faulty equipment is removed from use.

Method. Check the out-of-use tags on the walk, and the tag records.

Evidence to show. Out-of-use tag record.

Pass when. Every faulty device seen is tagged out of use, with a date and a name.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • Faulty equipment is seen in use with no out-of-use tag.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2011). Medical equipment maintenance programme overview. Geneva: WHO. Open source
  2. International Organization for Standardization (2016). ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices: Quality management systems. Requirements for regulatory purposes. Geneva: ISO. Open source
B3.5
Shared Spaces Are Clean

Standard

Shared clinical and waiting areas are cleaned on a documented schedule, with cleanliness verified by more than a visual check on the day of assessment.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Walk the shared clinical and waiting areas on the day of assessment. Review 3 months of cleanliness audit records.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Cleaning follows a documented schedule.

Method. Read the cleaning schedule and check the sign-off for the last 30 days.

Evidence to show. Cleaning schedule and sign-off sheets.

Pass when. At least 70% of scheduled cleans are signed off.

2. Cleanliness is checked beyond a visual check.

Method. Review the audit method, and check it includes a test such as ATP or a swab, or a checklist with set criteria.

Evidence to show. Cleanliness audit record.

Pass when. Audits use a set method, not only a visual check, and are done at least monthly.

3. Audit results lead to action.

Method. Review the actions from audits that failed.

Evidence to show. Audit action record.

Pass when. Each failed audit has a corrective action and a re-check.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • Shared areas are not cleaned on any documented schedule.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2014). Safe management of wastes from health-care activities, second edition. Geneva: WHO. Open source
  2. World Health Organization (2016). Guidelines on Core Components of Infection Prevention and Control Programmes at the National and Acute Health Care Facility Level. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B3.6
Facility Risks Are Tracked in One Integrated Register

Non-negotiable

Water safety, fire safety, equipment maintenance, and other facility risks are tracked together in one reviewed risk register — not as separate, disconnected checklists that nobody views as a whole picture.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the risk register and the last 4 quarterly reviews. Check 5 facility risks against their named owners.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Facility risks are in one register.

Method. Check that water, fire, equipment and other facility risks appear in the same register.

Evidence to show. Integrated facility risk register.

Pass when. All five facility risk types appear in the single register.

2. The register is reviewed on a set schedule.

Method. Check the review dates in the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Risk review minutes.

Pass when. Reviewed at least quarterly, with the minutes recorded.

3. Each risk has an owner and an action.

Method. Check the 5 sampled risks for an owner, a control and a target date.

Evidence to show. Register extract.

Pass when. At least 70% of the sampled risks have all three.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • Water, fire and equipment risks are held in separate records with no integrated register.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management: Guidelines. Geneva: ISO. Open source
  2. World Health Organization (2017). Hospital Safety Index: Guide for Evaluators, second edition. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B3.8
Facility Signage Is Complete Throughout the Building

Non-negotiable

Evacuation routes, emergency exits, restrooms, and procedure or department doors are clearly and consistently signed throughout the facility — not only the entrance and reception area covered under wayfinding, and not assumed adequately covered by evacuation drills alone.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Walk the facility from the main entrance to every restroom, emergency exit and evacuation route. Check 20 signs chosen at random.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Evacuation routes and exits are signed.

Method. Walk each route from the furthest point in the building.

Evidence to show. Walk-round signage checklist.

Pass when. Every route and exit has a sign at each decision point.

2. Restrooms and procedure doors are signed.

Method. Check each restroom and procedure door on the walk.

Evidence to show. Walk-round signage checklist.

Pass when. At least 70% of the restrooms and procedure doors are signed.

3. Signs are kept in place and readable.

Method. Check the 20 sampled signs for damage, fading and obstruction.

Evidence to show. Signage survey and quarterly check.

Pass when. At least 70% of the sampled signs are intact, readable and not obstructed.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • The emergency exit or evacuation route is not signed.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2017). Hospital Safety Index: Guide for Evaluators, second edition. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B3.9
Fault Prevention Is Planned, Not Only Repaired

Non-negotiable

Power, water, medical gases, ventilation and clinical information systems are identified as critical, each has a planned prevention and back-up arrangement, and failures are recorded and analysed so that the same fault does not recur.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the critical services list, the back-up plan and the failure log for the last 12 months.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Critical services are identified.

Method. Read the list and check it covers power, water, medical gases, ventilation and clinical information systems.

Evidence to show. Critical services list.

Pass when. All five critical services are on the list with an owner.

2. Back-up and testing are planned.

Method. Read the plan and check the test dates for the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Critical services testing and back-up plan.

Pass when. Each critical service has a back-up arrangement and a test at least once a year.

3. Failures are logged and analysed.

Method. Review the failure log for the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Failure log.

Pass when. Every failure has a log entry and an analysis or a recorded action.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A critical service has no back-up arrangement.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2017). Hospital Safety Index: Guide for Evaluators, second edition. Geneva: WHO. Open source
  2. International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management: Guidelines. Geneva: ISO. Open source
B3.10
Endoscopy Equipment Is Safe to Use and Properly Reprocessed

Standard

Endoscopes and endoscopic equipment are maintained, tested and reprocessed to a documented standard before each use, and records allow every use to be traced to the device and the reprocessing cycle.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the reprocessing and test log for the last 3 months and the records for 10 uses chosen at random.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Reprocessing follows a documented standard.

Method. Read the reprocessing standard and check it follows the manufacturer and national guidance.

Evidence to show. Endoscope reprocessing standard.

Pass when. Standard is approved and names each step from cleaning to storage.

2. Each use can be traced.

Method. For 10 uses, find the reprocessing record and the patient link.

Evidence to show. Reprocessing and test log.

Pass when. At least 70% of the 10 uses have a full record.

3. Equipment is tested before use.

Method. Check the leak and function tests in the log.

Evidence to show. Reprocessing and test log.

Pass when. Every endoscope in the sample has a passing test recorded before use.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • An endoscope was used with no reprocessing record.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2016). Decontamination and reprocessing of medical devices for health-care facilities. Geneva: WHO. Open source
  2. World Health Organization (2016). Guidelines on Core Components of Infection Prevention and Control Programmes at the National and Acute Health Care Facility Level. Geneva: WHO. Open source

Basis B4 · applies to every facility

Workforce, Digital Care and AI

Ten criteria that every facility meets, whatever its setting or services. They cover how staff are evaluated, trained, protected and heard, how working hours are set, how digital care and AI are introduced without disadvantaging patients, and how patients are told when AI supports their care. Each criterion shows how it is checked, the evidence to show, what passes, what fails immediately, the e-learning that supports it, and the references behind it.

Criteria on this page

B4.1B4.2B4.3B4.4B4.5B4.6B4.7B4.8B4.9B4.10

Two kinds of document

Means of verification. The policies, registers, forms and plans the surveyor checks. The organisation submits them.

Recommended. SOPs, guidelines and protocols that support good practice. They are held on site but are not verified.

How a surveyor reads each criterion

Statement→
Sample→
Method→
Evidence→
Pass ruleor
Immediate fail

How strict is Basis B4, by setting

Humanitarian settings
1 Essential
9 Recommended
Transition
1 Essential
9 Recommended
Standard
10 Essential
0 Recommended

Each row adds up to the total number of criteria on this page.

B4.1
Ongoing Competency Is Regularly Evaluated

Standard

The continued competency and ongoing performance of every workforce member is regularly evaluated against their actual job description and scope of practice — not competency assumed to remain current indefinitely once initial credentialing is complete.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the competency records for 10 staff chosen at random across three roles, and the evaluation policy.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Each sampled staff member has a competency assessment in the last 12 months.

Method. Check the assessment date for each of the 10 staff.

Evidence to show. Competency assessment form by role.

Pass when. At least 70% of the sampled staff were assessed within the last 12 months.

2. Assessments use the job description for the role.

Method. Compare the assessment form with the job description for each role sampled.

Evidence to show. Competency assessment form and job description.

Pass when. Each form lists the competencies of the role it is used for.

3. Gaps lead to a plan.

Method. Check the sampled records for any gap and its plan.

Evidence to show. Competency gap plan.

Pass when. Each recorded gap has a learning action with an owner and a date.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • Staff competency has never been assessed against the job description.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2016). Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B4.2
Staff Have Access to Ongoing Education and Skill Development

Standard

Every workforce member has access to ongoing education — formal courses and training sessions, whether internal or external — to maintain the performance their role requires and develop their skills further, not education treated as a one-time induction event with nothing meaningful offered afterwards.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the training matrix and the training attendance for the last 12 months, and interview 3 staff.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. A training matrix lists the required training by role.

Method. Read the matrix and check each role has its required courses.

Evidence to show. Training matrix register.

Pass when. Every role on the staff list has its required training listed.

2. Staff attend ongoing education.

Method. Check attendance for the last 12 months for the 10 sampled staff.

Evidence to show. Training attendance extract.

Pass when. At least 70% of the sampled staff attended at least one course in the last 12 months.

3. Staff can access education.

Method. Ask 3 staff how they request training and whether they have been released to attend.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each describes a route to request training and has been released when requested.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No training matrix exists and no staff member has attended any training in the last 12 months.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

References

  1. World Health Organization (2016). Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B4.3
Workforce Health and Safety Is Protected

Standard

The facility protects the health and safety of its workforce while they carry out their duties — required vaccinations, personal protective equipment, prevention of manual handling and needlestick injuries — not staff safety treated as secondary to patient safety rather than an equally protected concern. This includes the wellbeing of staff, with support available after distressing events.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the occupational health records, vaccination records and exposure reports for the last 12 months. Check 10 staff files.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Required vaccinations are in place.

Method. Check the vaccination status of the 10 sampled staff against the required list.

Evidence to show. Staff immunisation record.

Pass when. At least 70% of the sampled staff have every required vaccination, or a documented exemption.

2. Exposures are reported and managed.

Method. Review the exposure reports for the last 12 months and the response to each.

Evidence to show. Occupational exposure and needlestick response record.

Pass when. Each reported exposure has a response, follow-up and a recorded review.

3. Protective equipment is available.

Method. Check PPE stock on the walk and the PPE issue records.

Evidence to show. PPE issue record.

Pass when. PPE is available in all sampled clinical areas on the day of assessment.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A reported exposure has no follow-up.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: ISO. Open source
B4.4
Workplace Issues Raised by Staff Are Investigated and Resolved

Standard

A process exists for the investigation and resolution of workplace issues raised by workforce members — including whistleblowing concerns about organisational wrongdoing — with protection from adverse treatment for those who raise them, not a grievance process that exists on paper with no follow-through or protection.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the staff concern log for the last 12 months (all cases, or 10 if more).

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Concerns are logged.

Method. Review the concern log against the complaints and HR records.

Evidence to show. Staff concern and investigation record.

Pass when. Every concern raised in the period is logged.

2. Concerns are investigated within the time set in the procedure.

Method. Check the dates from raising to investigation close.

Evidence to show. Staff grievance and investigation procedure, with the log.

Pass when. At least 70% of the cases are closed within the set time.

3. The staff member is told the outcome.

Method. Check the outcome letter or record for each case.

Evidence to show. Outcome record.

Pass when. At least 70% of the cases have a recorded outcome shared with the staff member.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • A concern has been raised and no investigation is recorded.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. International Labour Organization (2019). Violence and Harassment Convention, 2019 (No. 190). Geneva: ILO. Open source
B4.5
Staff Are Protected From Violence and Aggression

Standard

The facility takes concrete steps to protect staff from violence and aggression — whether from patients, visitors, or other staff — ranging from verbal abuse and harassment through to physical assault, not workplace violence treated as an unavoidable, unaddressed feature of healthcare work.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the violence and aggression incident log for the last 12 months and the prevention plan. Interview 3 staff.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. A prevention and response procedure exists.

Method. Read the procedure and check its approval and review date.

Evidence to show. Violence and aggression prevention and response procedure.

Pass when. Approved and reviewed within the last 12 months.

2. Incidents are recorded and followed up.

Method. Check each incident in the log for a response and a follow-up.

Evidence to show. Violence and aggression incident record.

Pass when. At least 70% of incidents have a recorded response and follow-up.

3. Staff know what to do.

Method. Ask 3 staff what they do when a patient or visitor becomes aggressive.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. Each describes the response in the procedure.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • Staff have no route to report violence or aggression.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. International Labour Organization (2019). Violence and Harassment Convention, 2019 (No. 190). Geneva: ILO. Open source
B4.6
Workforce Feedback Is Gathered and Acted On

Standard

The facility has a systematic approach to gathering feedback from its workforce about their experience of working there, with analysis of trends and an implemented response — not feedback collected occasionally with no pattern of actual improvement resulting from it.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the last staff feedback survey, its results and the action plan.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. A survey of staff is run at least once a year.

Method. Check the date of the last survey.

Evidence to show. Staff feedback survey template and the completed survey.

Pass when. Survey run in the last 12 months.

2. Results are shared with staff.

Method. Check where and how the results were shared.

Evidence to show. Results communication record.

Pass when. Results were shared with staff within 3 months of the survey.

3. Results lead to action.

Method. Review the action plan from the survey.

Evidence to show. Action plan.

Pass when. At least one action has an owner and a date, and is reported as done or in progress.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No staff feedback has been gathered in the last 12 months.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

  • No course linked yet.
  • Planned course: Gathering and acting on workforce feedback. New course planned.

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: ISO. Open source
B4.7
Sick Leave and Attrition Data Inform Organisational Learning

Standard

The facility monitors and analyses data on staff sick leave and the reasons people leave, using this data to inform organisational learning and changes in practice that support workforce wellbeing and retention — not attrition treated as an unexamined, unavoidable cost of doing business.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the sickness absence and turnover register for the last 12 months and the analysis done.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Sickness and turnover are recorded.

Method. Check the register for each month of the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Sickness absence and turnover register.

Pass when. At least 10 of the last 12 months are recorded.

2. The data is analysed.

Method. Read the analysis for the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Sickness and attrition analysis.

Pass when. Analysis is done at least twice a year, with the main reasons named.

3. The analysis leads to action.

Method. Check the actions from the analysis.

Evidence to show. Action record.

Pass when. At least one action was taken from the last analysis.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • Sickness and turnover are not recorded.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

  • No course linked yet.
  • Planned course: Sickness and attrition analysis. New course planned.

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: ISO. Open source
  2. World Health Organization (2016). Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B4.8
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Across the Workforce Are Monitored

Standard

The organisation monitors and responds to patterns of equity across recruitment, work allocation, scheduling, and promotion — not an assumption that fair treatment exists simply because no formal complaint has been raised.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the workforce equity register for the last 12 months across recruitment, allocation, scheduling and promotion.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Equity data is collected.

Method. Check the register covers all four areas for the last 12 months.

Evidence to show. Workforce equity register.

Pass when. All four areas are covered for each quarter.

2. Patterns are reviewed.

Method. Read the review record.

Evidence to show. Workforce equity monitoring procedure and review.

Pass when. Reviewed at least once a year with a recorded finding.

3. Any pattern of inequity leads to action.

Method. Check any recorded pattern for an action.

Evidence to show. Action record.

Pass when. Each recorded pattern has an action with an owner.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • No equity data is collected for recruitment or promotion.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (2021). ISO 30415:2021 Human resource management: Diversity and inclusion. Geneva: ISO. Open source
B4.9
Working Hours and Rest Are Safe

Standard

Working hours, rest breaks and rotas are set in writing so that staff can work safely. Hours are monitored, and excessive hours are reported and reduced.

Humanitarian settings
Recommended
Transition
Recommended
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the written working hours and rest policy, the rota log for 8 weeks, and 10 staff records for hours worked.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. Hours and rest are set in writing.

Method. Read the policy and check it sets maximum hours and minimum rest.

Evidence to show. Working hours and rest policy.

Pass when. Policy sets a maximum weekly hours figure and a minimum rest period.

2. Rotas follow the policy.

Method. Check the 8 weeks of rotas against the policy.

Evidence to show. Rota and working hours log.

Pass when. At least 70% of the sampled rota weeks are within the policy limits.

3. Excessive hours are reported.

Method. Check the records for any exceedance and its report.

Evidence to show. Rota and working hours log.

Pass when. Every exceedance recorded has a report and a response.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • Working hours are not set in writing.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

E-learning

  • No course linked yet.
  • Planned course: Working hours, rest and fatigue. New course planned.

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: ISO. Open source
  2. World Health Organization (2016). Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. Geneva: WHO. Open source
B4.10
Staff Can Raise Concerns Through a Route That Protects Them

Non-negotiable

Staff can report safety concerns, misconduct and wrongdoing through a defined route that bypasses their line manager if needed. They are protected from retaliation, and reports are answered.

Humanitarian settings
Essential
Transition
Essential
Standard
Essential

Sample. Review the speak-up policy, the concern records for the last 12 months and the protection records. Interview 3 staff.

How the surveyor verifies this

1. A speak-up route bypasses the line manager.

Method. Read the policy and check a named route exists outside the line.

Evidence to show. Speak-up policy.

Pass when. Policy approved, names at least one route outside the line management chain, and is reviewed in the last 12 months.

2. Concerns are handled and protection is recorded.

Method. Check the concern records for handling and any protection measures.

Evidence to show. Concern handling and protection record.

Pass when. Every concern in the period has a handling record, and any retaliation complaint is recorded and investigated.

3. Staff know the route and trust it.

Method. Ask 3 staff how they would raise a safety concern and whether they would.

Evidence to show. Interview notes.

Pass when. At least 2 of 3 name the route and say they would use it.

Immediate fail (any one means the criterion is not met)

  • Staff have no route to raise a safety concern that bypasses their line manager.
  • A retaliation complaint has no recorded investigation.

Documents

Means of verification. The surveyor checks these. Submit them.

Recommended. Good practice, held on site. Not verified by the surveyor.

E-learning

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: ISO. Open source
  2. International Labour Organization (2019). Violence and Harassment Convention, 2019 (No. 190). Geneva: ILO. Open source
© 2026 Accréditation Sans Frontières · PHIG · Sheni Network